The board’s discussion on the Parks and Recreation master plan took center stage. A task work order for planning support services was proposed, aiming to evaluate existing parks and recreational facilities while addressing community requests for new amenities, such as bocce ball courts and splash pads. This initiative was described as part of the comprehensive plan to ensure a planned and budgeted approach to community needs. However, not all commissioners were in agreement regarding the financial aspects of the proposal. A debate ensued over a request for an additional $248,000 on top of an existing $350,000 annual amount. One commissioner expressed skepticism about the necessity of such funding and questioned the capability of city staff to handle the planning internally. Emphasizing existing community needs like a swimming pool and more sports courts, the commissioner challenged the proposed expenditure, urging a more prudent approach.

The city manager countered these concerns by highlighting the comprehensive nature of the master plan, which included facility assessments and community engagement. The procurement services director clarified that the funding request was part of the existing budget, focusing on surveys and public outreach without increasing the overall planning support contract. A call for a clearer breakdown of costs was made by a commissioner, emphasizing the need for detailed budget information to inform the decision-making process. The debate concluded with a motion to defer the decision to the next meeting, allowing for further discussion and ensuring all board members could participate in the vote.

The meeting also addressed the ratification of Keith Meade as the Building Development Director. Following the retirement of the previous official, Meade’s performance as interim director was praised by the city manager and commissioners alike. They noted his positive attitude and effective public interactions, which contributed to a noticeable reduction in complaints about the department. A commissioner emphasized the importance of public perception, stating, “For many years I’ve run a business. And I always said that you need to have 98% of the people swearing by you and 2% swearing at you,” highlighting Meade’s success in fostering community satisfaction.

Another topic of interest was the mission and responsibilities of the Maritime Commerce Committee. Delays in drafting a resolution regarding the committee’s makeup were discussed, with Commissioner Banther proposing a nomination process similar to that used for charter revisions. He suggested that each commissioner nominate two candidates. This initiative received support from other commissioners, who agreed on the necessity of a permanent committee to manage the city’s waterways effectively.

The meeting also saw the approval of Ordinance 2025-17, amending portions of the city’s code related to impact fees for water and sewer connections. The Public Services Director presented two options for impact fee calculations, with the board previously favoring an 80% recovery at full replacement value. The ordinance was adopted unanimously without further questions or public comments.

Public comments during the meeting revealed community concerns over technical difficulties in participating in Zoom calls and issues faced by seniors and Section 8 housing recipients following a fire at a housing complex. Residents expressed frustration over inadequate communication from housing authorities and urged the board to assist those affected by similar situations.

In closing, the board addressed concerns over a new bill, SB 180, which was perceived to undermine local governance by limiting the city’s ability to manage development. Commissioners expressed opposition to the bill and discussed potential support for a lawsuit against it.