The most notable discussion of the meeting centered on the rezoning request for the Shallow Family Subdivision, a 46-acre property located between North Highland Avenue and Keystone Road. The applicant sought to change the zoning designation from residential planned development (RPD) to agricultural for about 32.5 acres of the land. This change aimed to unify the zoning of the entire property under an agricultural designation. The planning supervisor provided historical context, explaining that part of the property had been used as a commercial borrow pit and acquired by the county for stormwater management related to road improvements.

Board discussions emphasized that rezoning to agricultural would restrict housing density, shifting from various housing types allowed under RPD to single-family detached homes on larger lots. This change would potentially reduce traffic impacts on Keystone Road, a scenic route with limited access. The board examined the implications of the rezoning, particularly in light of a previously denied 50-unit planned development and the potential effects on future property sales and development.

Attention was also given to the conditional uses allowed under the new zoning, including commercial borrow pit operations, although the current owner was not proposing such activities. The planning supervisor clarified that the existing borrow pit had likely been exhausted and would be utilized for stormwater management. The board approved the rezoning application for the four-unit estate subdivision, with members noting the limited development potential due to wetland and agricultural zoning constraints.

The meeting also addressed an unusual request for a conditional use permit to keep a miniature cow on a 0.33-acre residential property. The proposal garnered attention due to its novelty and the potential impacts on the neighborhood. The applicant detailed measures to mitigate concerns about noise, odor, and space limitations, proposing a barn-style shed for the cow and a waste management plan using airtight containers.

However, the applicants argued for the cow’s therapeutic benefits, particularly for their son with ADHD, and stressed their commitment to responsible ownership. They proposed a collaboration with a local school for a program aimed at children with disabilities, emphasizing the cow’s role as a pet rather than livestock.

Board members deliberated on the application, considering the potential nuisances and the property’s suitability for keeping a cow. Concerns were raised about property values, noise, and the precedent it might set for similar requests. The board ultimately rejected the application, citing the property’s size and potential impacts on neighbors as primary concerns.

In addition to these main topics, the board discussed updating noise regulations for establishments serving alcoholic beverages. The proposed changes sought to establish specific decibel limits for noise during different times of the week. Board members questioned the absence of a memorandum from city officials and emphasized the need for further research and public input before finalizing any updates.