The proposed $20 million loan emerged as a primary topic of debate, as commissioners weighed its potential benefits against the risks of increased debt. One commissioner expressed skepticism, pointing out the lack of clarity regarding project priorities and the potential financial burden on the city. They questioned whether residents should have a say in the borrowing decision. Despite the general fund appearing stable, concerns were raised about the broader fiscal implications of the loan, with some commissioners advocating for a more cautious approach to borrowing.

Proponents of the loan argued that it provided a strategic opportunity to address urgent infrastructure needs, thereby preventing future cost escalations. They emphasized that the debt service would be manageable within the city’s budgetary framework, asserting that it would not compromise financial health.

In tandem with the loan discussions, the board reviewed the city’s compensation study, which revealed disparities in pay adjustments across employee levels. The comprehensive analysis presented by a consultant highlighted that some upper management positions might receive increases as high as 16%, while lower-tier employees were proposed a 3% cost-of-living adjustment. This disparity prompted concern among commissioners, who emphasized the need for a fairer distribution of pay increases. Suggestions were made to adjust the lower-level employee raises to better reflect economic pressures.

The board also reviewed the organizational structure, with suggestions to streamline titles and clarify roles within the city’s management. Some commissioners questioned the necessity of maintaining multiple assistant city manager positions, arguing for a more efficient use of resources. The debate touched on the broader implications of such structural changes, with a focus on retaining skilled employees and ensuring competitive compensation across departments.

The proposed budget for fiscal year 2026, totaling $119 million, was presented by the finance director. The budget outlines substantial capital projects and new funding allocations, including a notable rise in the water and sewer fund due to planned infrastructure improvements.