The case began with Mike Ralston, a certified code enforcement officer, recounting the events leading to the stop work order. Ralston received a notification from the Planning and Zoning department about Kirkwood’s patio installation, which violated the Land Development Code and the community’s master stormwater agreement. Upon visiting the property, Ralston observed ongoing construction and issued a stop work order in Kirkwood’s absence. Despite this, Kirkwood later completed the project, leading to the current enforcement action.

He stated, “Had the HOA shared that [compliance letter] with residents, I wouldn’t be here,” emphasizing the disconnect in communication channels. Kirkwood also argued that other properties with similar installations had not faced comparable penalties.

Board members engaged in a thorough discussion about the necessity of upholding city regulations and the importance of compliance. They highlighted that the board’s role was not punitive but aimed at ensuring adherence to city codes. The board members acknowledged Kirkwood’s predicament, with one stating that the board’s primary focus should remain on the current violation and not on past cases or HOA involvement.

Kirkwood proposed leaving the rock beneath the pavers for better drainage, but the board emphasized their role in maintaining compliance with city ordinances rather than addressing engineering concerns. They extended Kirkwood’s proposed compliance timeline to 20 days, allowing him time to consult with city officials. The board then unanimously voted to formally find Kirkwood in violation, imposing a daily fine starting August 1 until compliance was verified.

In a separate segment of the meeting, the board reviewed progress on other code enforcement actions. A board member presented successful cleanup efforts on a property previously ordered by the board. The property had received media attention, and the board expressed gratitude for the public works staff’s efforts in addressing the issue.

Public comments during the meeting included remarks from a former board member, who praised the current board’s improved operations and its focus on making the city a better place. He noted the board’s efficiency in resolving issues without adversarial dynamics, stating, “I think this is much, much more efficient to get people to do what they need to do.”