The meeting opened with discussion on the City Manager position, a role in the administration of Tarpon Springs. This step is seen as an important part of the vetting process. The Board agreed to revisit the number of candidates to interview after the background checks are completed.

A significant portion of the discussion focused on the logistics of the background checks, particularly the necessity to expedite the process for out-of-state candidates. The commissioners were aware of the delicate timing, recognizing that candidates might be considering multiple opportunities. To mitigate potential delays, the board discussed obtaining permission from each candidate to conduct the background checks swiftly. They also acknowledged the importance of involving city staff in the evaluation of candidates.

Salary expectations of the candidates were also a topic of interest, as the commissioners considered this an important factor in their decision-making process.

In tandem with the City Manager search, the commission undertook a review of the city’s budget, which is projected to be around $86 million. Revenue sources, such as charges for services and taxes, were examined, and a timetable for budget workshops and public hearings was established. Public engagement emerged as a issue, with the finance director expressing concern over the low level of citizen participation and urging the public to utilize the community engagement website for input.

The inclusion of a splash park in Dorset Park’s budget became a focal point of public comments. One resident advocated for the addition, citing benefits for local children, while another raised concerns about the effectiveness of the Connect Tarpon platform for gathering public input, calling for more accessible language to promote wider community engagement.

Further, the prioritization of projects and their alignment with the city’s strategic plan was debated, with the aim of ensuring that community priorities are reflected in the city’s long-term goals. The commissioners also discussed the need for improved communication with residents, emphasizing the importance of simplifying language to facilitate meaningful engagement.

Infrastructure concerns were brought forward by residents through emails, with particular emphasis on the need for a fully functional sewer system on Bayshore Drive. The commission considered the allocation of budget for this essential service, as well as the broader challenges of funding capital projects. Discussions about the sponge docks project highlighted the economic impact of addressing flooding issues and the necessity of a clear objective for the initiative.

The commissioners grappled with the concept of discretionary funds within the budget, debating the actual amount available for new decisions. While one commissioner suggested that about $15 million was at their discretion, another countered that all funds were accounted for.

Throughout the deliberations, the commissioners considered the implications of upcoming electoral changes, stressing the need to involve the incoming commissioner in crucial decisions. They also reflected on the satisfaction of the silent majority of residents with the city’s direction, despite the challenges presented by managing and prioritizing several projects.