The meeting also delved into the city’s comprehensive plan update, which outlined future land use, transportation safety, coastal management, and other key elements aimed at shaping the city’s growth and development. The commissioners discussed zoning, public engagement, and economic development strategies within the plan, emphasizing long-range planning and the need for public participation in the decision-making process.

Another topic of discussion was the potential purchase of a property known as the Stemmes property. Commissioners considered the possible uses for the property, including expansion into a solar farm and its role in future dredging projects. After recognizing the importance of the property to the city, discussions turned to its financial implications and the search for a fair purchase price.

The commission debated the authorization of expenses for a city official and their spouse to attend a sister city trip. Concerns were raised about the optics and ethical implications of including the spouse’s expenses in the city budget. After discussion, the motion was amended to include only the spouse’s expenses, and it was ultimately approved.

Residents also brought forth their frustrations about the appointment process for an open seat on the board, the lack of input in decision-making processes, and the need for transparent communication. In particular, the public expressed concern over the potential impact on the community’s way of life and questioned the direction of the board’s decisions. Calls for public workshops and greater involvement in proposed projects were evident throughout the meeting.

The meeting proceeded with discussions on various other topics, including the awarding of utility rehabilitation and construction services, code enforcement settlements, and the restoration of the Anglo Dredge spoil site. The commissioners considered the financial and legal aspects of these issues, with public comments reflecting concerns about property value, financial penalties, and the efficient handling of code enforcement cases.

Moreover, the commissioners engaged in a conversation about the timeline for submitting charter questions for the November election. They also addressed concerns regarding a sewer project on Bay Shore Drive, with the possibility of allowing residents to opt for remaining on septic systems, and the feasibility of modifying ordinances to accommodate resident preferences.