Central to the committee’s agenda was the debate over residency requirements for city officials. Police Chief Jeff Young contributed to the conversation, highlighting the complexities and financial implications of imposing a residency requirement on positions like the police chief, city manager, and fire chief. The debate extended to the practicality of a mileage-based residency criterion, with committee members eventually settling on a ten-mile radius from city hall for certain city employees. Further discussions revolved around whether key positions should be mandated to live within the city limits and the potential for exemptions for current employees up for promotion.

The committee also grappled with the assistant city manager’s role, particularly in the absence of the city manager. Members debated the specifics of when and how the assistant should assume the city manager’s duties. Opinions varied on whether the takeover should be automatic after a certain time frame, such as 24 or 48 hours, or if a designated process was necessary. Ultimately, the committee voted to adopt the language as written.

Another topic of discussion was the Civil Service Board’s role and relevance. With the last meeting of the board occurring 14 years ago, members debated its practical significance and whether it should be retained, streamlined, or eliminated. Opinions were divided on the board’s psychological impact on employees, its efficacy, and the challenge of finding volunteers to serve.

The committee also deliberated on potential amendments to the charter related to the eligibility of individuals to hold the office of mayor or commissioner. The proposed changes focused on the term of office and qualifications, specifically after a break in service of 12 months. While some members questioned the frequency of such situations, others underscored the broader implications on service and the city’s governance.

Election-related discussions included the merits of November versus March elections, voter participation, the cost of mailers, and the qualifying periods for candidates. A motion was passed to change the qualifying time and to send a direct mailer 30 business days before the qualifying period. Additionally, the issue of a one-year wait-out period for serving on a vacant seat was acknowledged but not discussed.

In addition to these topics, the committee addressed the naming of the Tarpon Springs Police Department and Fire Department, the consistency between the Board of Adjustment and the Planning and Zoning Board, and the process of streamlining authority for appointed boards. Although a suggestion was made to rename a section related to the police department for better clarity, the committee ultimately decided against it.