The primary focus of the Tarpon Springs Planning and Zoning Board’s meeting centered on the establishment of a neighborhood conservation overlay (NCO) district, which could serve as a tool to protect the unique character of various parts of the city. The NCO district proposal includes a draft ordinance to preserve areas of historic or cultural significance, such as the sponge docks and the Hope Athens area, as well as the potential central Tarpon CRA and the Union Academy area. The board reviewed two versions of the draft ordinance, deliberating on amendments to definitions and processes. There was a emphasis on ensuring the proposal aligns with community support and on the need for public hearings before any adoption.

The board debated the proposed requirement that 51% of property owners support the designation of a historic district. A suggestion was made that the conservation overlay could be an alternative not necessarily linked to historic or cultural preservation, which could prevent the construction of buildings that do not fit the existing area’s ambiance. Another point of contention was the role of nonprofit civic organizations in initiating NCO designations, with some board members expressing reservations about the clarity and potential implications of this aspect of the proposal.

Public feedback played a critical role in the meeting. Historical context was provided regarding the establishment and expansion of the historic district in Tarpon Springs, along with the positive impacts of updated design guidelines. The community’s support and opposition to these expansions were also discussed.

In addition to the NCO district, the board discussed the site plan for the new Tarpon Springs Fire Station 70. The principal planner with the planning and zoning department presented the project details, which include an 8200 square foot building with three vehicle bays and seven dorm rooms. The staff recommended approval of the site plan with conditions related to roadway permits and utilities. There were no public comments on the application, and the board discussed the plan’s compliance with the comprehensive plan, land development code, and city emergency management system.

The meeting also addressed concerns about the future zoning of a city property set to be abandoned and its proximity to a local preschool. A board member highlighted the importance of maintaining the property under city control to prevent potential sales to private entities.

Comprehensive planning was another topic of discussion, with board members emphasizing the need for public involvement in the ongoing process of updating the comprehensive plan.

The board’s conversation touched on the state’s regulations affecting local design control, expressing concern over efforts to limit local authority over design regulations. Additionally, the board discussed the need for redundancy in the comprehensive plan to ensure that changes are not overlooked, as well as the involvement of a consultant focusing on affordable housing and potential changes to parking and compatibility codes.

The meeting concluded with a decision to adjourn, but not before addressing a recent applicant’s treatment. While some members expressed frustration about perceived disrespect towards the board, others felt the board had been thorough and thoughtful in its approach.