Teaneck Town Council Discusses Library and Public Safety Budgets Amid Community Concerns

At the recent Teaneck Town Council meeting, the primary focus was on financial allocations for the public library and public safety departments. The meeting, held in a hybrid format, saw residents and council members addressing concerns over tax increases, library renovations, police department needs, and fire department staffing.

12:21The most pressing topic was the budget for the Teaneck Public Library, which became a focal point during the public comments segment. Residents advocated for the library, emphasizing its role as a community hub. They stressed that the library’s budget should not face cuts, especially with inflationary pressures and post-renovation needs. One resident called the library an “inclusive space” that serves diverse demographic groups, urging the council to support its operating budget. Another resident, a former officer of the Friends of the Library, highlighted the library’s ongoing programming efforts despite renovations and praised the staff’s dedication. The library’s reopening, initially planned for September, has been delayed to October due to unforeseen abatement issues, prompting calls for enhanced funding to ensure a seamless transition.

32:41During discussions, a library representative revealed that operating expenditures had declined from $2.9 million in 2021 to $2.7 million in 2024, despite rising costs for essential resources and employee benefits. They emphasized the importance of upgrading phone lines and security systems to ensure safety. The representative also addressed digital resource costs, noting that eBooks, while increasingly popular, often incur higher costs due to limitations on usage, contrasting with print materials.

45:38Simultaneously, the council deliberated on the police department’s budget, with the department requesting an increase from the previous year’s budget to $476,500. This request was driven by staffing challenges, with several officers and clerical staff nearing retirement. The police chief highlighted the need for additional personnel, particularly for roles in community policing and managing body-worn camera footage. The department also faced increased training and operational demands, necessitating a shift to a digital radio network to enhance communication reliability.

59:01The police budget discussion extended to capital needs, including new radios, rifles, and vehicles. The chief explained that existing communication tools are unreliable, posing safety risks, and emphasized the importance of maintaining a robust fleet of vehicles. Council members expressed support for these requests, acknowledging the critical nature of effective communication and operational readiness.

01:16:59Public safety discussions also covered the fire department, with concerns over staffing and infrastructure taking center stage. The fire chief requested a budget of $675,000, stressing the necessity for adequate personnel and resources to meet emergency response needs. The department’s staffing, currently at 93, falls short of optimal levels, often relying on mutual aid from neighboring towns. The fire headquarters, aged and lacking modern amenities, underscores the need for infrastructure updates to ensure a safe working environment.

01:29:58The council also explored potential cost-saving measures, such as merging fire departments with neighboring municipalities like Hackensack, to enhance safety and efficiency. Additionally, the fire chief noted an increase in training expenses due to legal requirements and the influx of new officers needing training.

16:19Residents raised concerns about sewer billing discrepancies and lack of public input in budget subcommittee meetings, calling for greater transparency and ethical governance. In response, the Township CFO acknowledged a planned tax increase this year, despite no cuts to services, and introduced a new tax billing system to address these concerns.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly: