Temple Terrace Considers Easing Regulations on Sheds and ADUs Amidst Legislative Changes

The Temple Terrace Code Enforcement Board meeting focused on discussions surrounding the regulation of accessory structures like sheds and accessory dwelling units (ADUs). The board deliberated on aligning local regulations with neighboring jurisdictions, particularly Hillsborough County, and navigating recent legislative developments that could impact the city’s control over ADUs.

0:05One notable issue emerged from the discussion about shed permit requirements, where current discrepancies between Temple Terrace and surrounding areas have caused confusion and frustration among residents. The city’s current regulation, which necessitates permits for sheds under certain conditions, has been deemed burdensome by board members and residents alike. The discussion centered on the fact that while Hillsborough County does not require permits for sheds up to 100 square feet, Temple Terrace’s threshold is 150 square feet, provided the shed is delivered pre-assembled. This has led to situations where homeowners unwittingly violate permit requirements, facing penalties as a result.

A consensus among board members leaned towards simplifying these regulations to reduce resident confusion and align more closely with neighboring jurisdictions. The city manager supported the idea of eliminating permit requirements for all sheds under 150 square feet, regardless of their assembly method, arguing that this change would mitigate misunderstandings and unnecessary conflicts. The City Attorney highlighted the importance of permits in ensuring proper shed placement and compliance with safety standards, suggesting that while simplifications could prevent resident frustration, safety and property disputes must still be considered.

1:59:14Moreover, the conversation extended to accessory dwelling units (ADUs), a topic gaining prominence due to recent legislative updates. The introduction of new state legislation mandates that local governments permit ADUs in any single-family residential zone, challenging Temple Terrace’s current stance on ADUs. This legislative change eliminates the requirement for these units to be rented at an affordable rate and restricts local governments from imposing rental restrictions not applied to other housing types in the same district.

The board expressed concern over these impending changes, emphasizing the need for a local ordinance to ensure owner occupancy for one of the units on a property. This requirement aims to prevent both units from becoming short-term rentals, preserving community integrity. The potential for state legislation to override local control prompted a sense of urgency among board members to establish local regulations before such state mandates take effect. Discussions also touched on the physical feasibility of constructing ADUs within existing lots, given zoning laws and buildable footprints.

While the board appeared to favor the establishment of ADU regulations under the condition of owner occupancy, further examination of details concerning setbacks, construction types, and additional requirements was deemed necessary before finalizing any proposals. There was also acknowledgment of the need to present an ordinance before the Planning Commission in June to expedite the process and maintain some level of local control over ADU regulations.

1:25:27In addition to sheds and ADUs, the board delved into discussions about other zoning and land use regulations, including the potential for microbreweries in Temple Terrace. The current restrictions have hindered the establishment of such businesses within the city, and there was a call to revise these ordinances to allow breweries in commercial areas. The board recognized the evolving business model for breweries, which often operate without kitchens and instead utilize food trucks. The discussions acknowledged the presence of successful microbrewery models in industrial parks.

1:08:50Another area of focus was the regulation of commercial vehicles in residential zones, particularly concerning overnight parking and signage. The board considered adopting definitions from Hillsborough County, which could provide clearer guidelines and alleviate enforcement challenges. Discussions about vehicle classifications, signage on vehicles, and the balance between community standards and residents’ needs were central to these deliberations.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: