The proposed townhome project, consisting of four buildings with two units each, has been a topic of thorough discussion among council members and the public due to several waivers requested by the developer. These waivers include reductions in front and rear yard setbacks, maximum building coverage, and minimum open space, as well as adjustments to setbacks from property lines and structures. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning, and the council’s debate focused on the compatibility of the proposed development with the existing neighborhood, the potential precedent for granting exceptions, and adherence to architectural and design standards.

Members of the public voiced opposition to the rezoning, concerned about the implications for future projects and the preservation of the neighborhood’s character. Despite these concerns, the developer’s representative emphasized the project’s compliance with the design standards outlined in the downtown overlay district and presented various elevations to demonstrate this alignment.

Another agenda item was the discussion on the Community Investment Tax (CIT), which has been a source of funding for infrastructure projects in Hillsborough County since its approval by voters in 1996. The Deputy County Administrator, Greg Horwood, presented the proposed interlocal agreement for the distribution of CIT proceeds, which would be levied from December 1st, 2026, through December 31st, 2041, pending voter approval. Horwood articulated the importance of the tax in funding essential infrastructure like transportation improvements, public safety, and cultural amenities, and noted that approximately 20% of the tax is paid for by individuals living outside the community.

Council members engaged in a discussion about the criteria for the county’s support of projects within Temple Terrace, specifically inquiring about funding a new fire station predominantly serving the city’s residents. The dialogue underscored the need for a clear understanding of the guidelines for using CIT funds. Moreover, the council highlighted the importance of strategic planning and collaboration to tackle the infrastructure challenges posed by the county’s projected population growth.

The allocation of CIT funds to schools was another point of contention, with a 5% allocation to the school district challenged by some council members. One member notably stated their disagreement with this allocation, pointing out that the school district possesses its own funding mechanisms. Nevertheless, the city manager cited a need to support schools, referencing a $244 million cost over the next 15 years for nine schools.

Additionally, the council approved a two-year audit service contract with MSLP for the fiscal years 2024 and 2025, at a cost of $54,000 for the financial audit and $3,000 for the community redevelopment area audit annually. The possibility of a single audit was mentioned, should Federal award expenditures exceed $750,000.

The council also addressed the scheduling of a closed executive session to discuss fire labor negotiations, set to occur on June 18, 2024, the same date as the second reading and public hearing for the rezoning ordinance. Furthermore, Council Member Chambers reported on the City Hall art projects, emphasizing the importance of community engagement for public art initiatives.