Tenafly Borough Council Navigates Piermont Road Closure and Outdoor Seating Complexities
- Meeting Overview:
At the recent Tenafly Borough Council meeting, members confronted several community issues, including the proposed closure of Piermont Road, outdoor seating arrangements, and traffic concerns. Residents and council members alike voiced their opinions on these topics, which have implications for local infrastructure and community life.
The meeting began with a discussion about the proposed permanent closure of Piermont Road. Council members deliberated on the expected traffic impact, particularly during school hours, and considered the need for effective public communication regarding these changes. Construction of traffic lights is scheduled to commence at the end of August, with completion anticipated by the end of October. Council members acknowledged the community’s concerns about the increased difficulty of making U-turns in the area. They agreed to follow the traffic engineer’s recommendations and tasked the borough attorney with drafting necessary ordinances to facilitate the project’s next steps.
Public comments shifted the focus to outdoor seating options. An audience member addressed rumors about potential new outdoor structures, such as food trucks and additional tables. They expressed skepticism about the viability of these structures, emphasizing that existing park facilities already provide adequate seating without requiring additional infrastructure. Additionally, concerns were raised about maintaining these new structures and the potential need for full-time staff management.
Further, the speaker suggested that the placement of a rumored new restaurant could obstruct views of the train station and nearby businesses. They highlighted past outdoor structures that did not impede sightlines, expressing concern over how new proposals might affect the town’s aesthetic and accessibility. The speaker questioned the long-term feasibility of these new developments and the financial commitments required from potential investors.
The discussion also addressed the possibility of obtaining a liquor license for an establishment in the town center. The speaker emphasized creating a welcoming atmosphere to attract visitors, citing the success of Café Angelique as an example of fostering a communal environment. They expressed disappointment with past denials of liquor license applications and urged the council to reconsider such proposals to enhance downtown vibrancy.
The council acknowledged these concerns and agreed to discuss outdoor seating, liquor licenses, and related matters in a closed session later in the meeting.
Residents also voiced frustrations over property management and operational constraints for local businesses. One resident detailed how ongoing construction at a neighboring property on Burlington Street had compromised their enjoyment of their backyard for three consecutive summers. They presented evidence of erosion attributed to construction activities and questioned the enforcement of building codes, prompting the council to consider the potential for stop work orders if violations persist.
In another public comment, a resident expressed frustration over the inability to operate their café later in the evening due to inadequate electrical infrastructure. They highlighted safety concerns involving extension cords and urged the council to investigate solutions to support their business operations.
Traffic concerns were also prominent. A resident called attention to heavy vehicles frequently passing through residential areas, posing hazards to pedestrians and drivers alike. They stressed the importance of council members addressing these safety issues, emphasizing their responsibility to protect residents.
The meeting touched on other topics, such as the rejection of bids for a field upgrade project due to unexpectedly high costs. Discussions revealed community divisions over the type of field desired, with differing preferences between the softball and baseball communities. The council considered alternative options, including incorporating grass into the project, while exploring fundraising efforts to cover additional expenses.
The adoption of a sign regulation ordinance was another key topic. Council members supported maintaining clear sidewalks to enhance safety, particularly for seniors and children. The ordinance passed unanimously after discussions emphasized the importance of unobstructed pedestrian pathways.
Finally, the council addressed several ordinances and resolutions, including the appropriation of funds for land stewardship costs and accessible trails at the nature center. Public comments highlighted the progress of these projects at a federal level. The council also discussed flood hazard maps, the borough’s affordable housing fair share plan, and the potential for educational campaigns regarding town sirens.
Mark Zinna
City Council Officials:
, Jamie Corsair, Lauren Dayton, Adam Michaels, Julie O’Connor, Daniel Park, John Roglieri
-
Meeting Type:
City Council
-
Committee:
-
Meeting Date:
06/16/2025
-
Recording Published:
06/23/2025
-
Duration:
65 Minutes
-
Notability Score:
Routine
Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:
-
State:
New Jersey
-
County:
Bergen County
-
Towns:
Tenafly
Recent Meetings Nearby:
- 12/09/2025
- 12/09/2025
- 79 Minutes
- 12/09/2025
- 12/10/2025
- 178 Minutes
- 12/09/2025
- 12/09/2025
- 182 Minutes