Public comments highlighted the community’s division on the matter. Several residents, including Jeff Carter from the Bergen County NAACP, urged Baglia to resign, citing the need for public officials to uphold community standards. Carter emphasized, “You represent the entire community, not a portion of it.” In contrast, many attendees, including residents and community leaders, defended Baglia, attributing the controversy to cultural misunderstandings. They emphasized his long-standing contributions to local initiatives, particularly in youth sports, and argued that his character was being misjudged.

During the meeting, another resident expressed that Baglia’s refusal to apologize was contributing to the division within the community. They stressed the importance of acknowledging when someone is offended, regardless of intent, as a step towards healing and unity. Despite the allegations, Baglia maintained his innocence, stating that he would not apologize for something he did not do. His supporters echoed this sentiment, focusing on his positive impact in Hackensack, particularly in fostering community engagement through soccer programs.

In addition to the debate over Baglia, the council meeting addressed several municipal projects, such as the controversial “Dome” recreational facility. The project, intended to provide indoor sports opportunities for local youth, faced criticism over its escalating costs, which had reportedly doubled from initial estimates. Eileen O’Reilly, a resident, questioned the financial priorities of the city, arguing that educational infrastructure should take precedence. City officials defended the project, citing studies that underscore its necessity for community engagement.

Further discussions revealed financial strategies related to the Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) program, which was described as essential for funding infrastructure improvements. The council reiterated that this program would not directly fund schools, despite public concerns. They assured residents that revenue from local dispensaries and other sources would be reinvested into community projects, including tree planting initiatives.

The meeting also navigated ongoing tensions within the council itself, with disputes over political alliances and campaign dynamics surfacing. A council member addressed allegations from the mayor regarding their removal from a campaign ticket, asserting that the move was politically motivated. The mayor countered, emphasizing team cohesion as a priority for council operations.