The board also tackled proposed changes across several zoning overlays, including Tequesta Drive, US1, and Village Center, which aim to shape the village’s development and maintain its neighborhood character. The board debated the practicality of square footage limits for formula businesses, the placement of drive-throughs, and the potential adjustments to setback requirements. Furthermore, the aesthetic aspects of the village were addressed through deliberations on architectural standards, landscaping enhancements, and the introduction of civic open spaces in new developments. The introduction of Jared, a new alternate member to the board, and the presentation by legal counsel on board responsibilities and ethical conduct were additional focal points of the meeting.

Jonathan Moda’s presentation on SPM 1-24 initiated a broader conversation about the village’s identity and environmental considerations. The board members and public commenters expressed favorable opinions on the proposed color palette. The idea of pre-approved colors for buildings suggested by a board member introduced the prospect of streamlining aesthetic decisions in the future. Public input included a recommendation to approve the paint colors and a condition to remove the artificial turf, citing environmental concerns and the need for natural landscaping.

The meeting then shifted to the larger framework of municipal planning. The legal counsel’s presentation served to reaffirm the board’s role in adhering to Tequesta’s comprehensive plan and Land Development regulations. The counsel stressed the importance of following procedures, observing ethical codes, and maintaining transparency in board activities. The update on Land Development regulations highlighted the ongoing efforts to refine the village’s commercial corridor through the implementation of overlays.

With the introduction of the Tequesta Drive Overlay, the board scrutinized the implications of limiting formula businesses to 1250 square feet and the impact on the local retail landscape. The intention behind the overlay is to foster a neighborhood ambiance conducive to small retail and service-oriented businesses while preserving the architectural integrity and aesthetic of the area. Concerns were raised about the practicality of this size limitation for formula businesses and the possible effects on existing establishments.

The proposed US One Corridor changes included reevaluating setback requirements and strategizing the placement of drive-throughs to enhance the visual and functional aspects of the area. The board proposed that drive-throughs should be situated on the side or rear of buildings and adequately screened from public view.

The Village Center overlay discussion emphasized pedestrian-friendly designs, architectural variety, and connectivity between key streets in Tequesta. The board pondered the allowance of porches on Bridge Road and the waiver process, which could provide some flexibility in the code to encourage public benefits or superior design outcomes.

Landscaping and civic space occupied a significant segment of the meeting, with the board reviewing amendments to the code that call for increased greenery, including the necessity for street trees and parking lot canopies. The concept of civic open space was introduced, mandating that significant new developments or redevelopments provide public spaces such as plazas or playgrounds.

The board also addressed the strict guidelines for variances and waivers, emphasizing the need to adhere closely to code requirements while allowing for some degree of flexibility. The possibility of a payment in lieu of providing civic open space was mentioned as an alternative for developments unable to meet this requirement.

The meeting concluded with the acknowledgment of Jared as the newest alternate member, eager to engage with the village’s codes and regulations, and a motion to adjourn which was subsequently passed.