The most notable discussion of the meeting centered around the request to extend the height of a security fence at a facility housing boys aged 12 to 17. The facility, which has encountered issues with youths running away, sought approval to construct a 10-foot fence to enhance security. Trevor Matthysse, a representative of the facility, highlighted the challenges faced, noting that the existing eight-foot fence was inadequate in preventing escapes, particularly during overnight hours when police resources are limited. Matthysse detailed the obligations to report absconding incidents to the Department of Children and Families, which necessitate significant police involvement.

Greg Primo, a supporter of the variance, echoed Matthysse’s concerns, citing previous failures of an eight-foot fence to deter escapes. Primo emphasized the safety benefits that a taller fence would bring to both the residents and the surrounding community. Jacob Nessio, the fence contractor, addressed design specifications, confirming that the new fence would not feature barbed wire.

The board, after considering public input and the facility’s history of struggles with runaways, approved the variance with a majority vote, allowing the increased fence height with the condition that it be implemented only on specific sides of the property. One board member dissented, emphasizing the need for further security measures beyond the physical barrier, such as the use of mag lock systems on doors and gates.

In other matters, the board deliberated on a variance request for a property on Christian Court. The applicant sought to exceed the maximum building coverage allowed in the R3 zoning district due to historical infrastructure constraints. Staff recommended approval, aligning with the city’s comprehensive plan for infill development. Kim Fischer, the project’s engineer, confirmed that the variance was procedural and in line with previous development approvals. The board unanimously approved the request after brief deliberation, acknowledging the historical limitations faced by the property.

Furthermore, variance number 19-225 for the property on Susanna Lane was discussed. Darlene Tindle of TPK Investments LLC presented the request for a front yard setback reduction due to the unique shape of the lot. The board had previously denied a more significant variance but noted the applicant’s adjustments to better conform to regulations. Staff recommended approval, citing the lot’s special conditions as not attributable to the applicant’s actions. The board approved the variance unanimously, acknowledging the unique circumstances of the lot.

The meeting also addressed procedural matters, including the election of officers, where the existing chairman and vice chairman were re-elected without opposition. The board noted the departure of a member to the Planning and Zoning Commission, creating an opportunity for a new alternate member.