- Filters
- NJ
- Monmouth County
- 6/30/25
- 07/01/2025
- 39 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Asbury Park Planning Board held a special meeting on June 30, 2025, to address matters concerning the city’s housing element and fair share plan. The session was called to ensure compliance with deadlines for the fourth round of this planning process, as the city faces legal obligations under New Jersey’s affordable housing mandates. Significant discussions centered on rehabilitation obligations, a major affordable housing project, and procedural challenges faced by the board.
- NJ
- Monmouth County
- 6/25/25
- 06/25/2025
- 46 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Asbury Park City Council meeting was marked by a focus on resident concerns over parking difficulties, infrastructure changes, and redevelopment plans. The council deliberated on these issues, providing a forum for public input and addressing various ordinances and resolutions.
- NJ
- Monmouth County
- 6/19/25
- 06/23/2025
- 75 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The recent Deal Lake Commission meeting addressed issues including a new stormwater management project funded by a significant grant, ongoing concerns about a dock construction violating environmental regulations, and various environmental management challenges facing the lake.
- NJ
- Monmouth County
- 6/17/25
- 06/18/2025
- 66 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Asbury Park Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting on June 17, 2025, focused on two primary issues: a resolution regarding a property on Somerfield Avenue and the interpretation of a zoning ordinance in relation to a roof deck at 301 8th Avenue, Unit 3. With Chairman Avalone recusing himself, the board engaged in discussions on these topics.
- NJ
- Monmouth County
- 6/16/25
- 06/16/2025
- 27 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Asbury Park Planning Board, convening under Chairwoman Barbara Kurszac, discussed and unanimously approved a subdivision application to adjust lot lines for properties at 607 and Soul Avenue, sparking debate over the potential requirement for underground utilities.