- Filters
- CO
- Larimer County
- 5/13/25
- 05/13/2025
- 217 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Poudre School Board meeting focused on recognizing student achievements, addressing a new district-wide cell phone policy, and discussing concerns over mental health funding. The board unanimously passed resolutions supporting various heritage and appreciation weeks, while public comments highlighted challenges in education funding and mental health services.
- CO
- Larimer County
- 5/13/25
- 05/14/2025
- 16 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The recent Poudre School District Board meeting highlighted the achievements of student athletes and bilingual students in the district. Mariah Gonzalez and Billy Greenwood were celebrated for their wrestling accomplishments, and the meeting also recognized the success of students in the state Spanish spelling bee.
- CO
- Boulder County
- 5/13/25
- 05/13/2025
- 236 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During the Boulder Valley School Board meeting, discussions unfolded regarding the controversial dismissal of Broomfield High School’s cheer coach, Bailey Turner, the results of a comprehensive mental health study, and potential funding changes impacting local schools. These topics drew impassioned responses from students, parents, and board members alike, highlighting ongoing tensions and priorities within the district.
- CO
- Arapahoe County
- 5/12/25
- 05/12/2025
- 64 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The recent Cherry Creek School District 5 Board meeting focused on significant educational initiatives, student achievements, and challenges faced by the district. Discussions ranged from the potential early implementation of a dyslexia screening program to community concerns over staff conduct and student safety.
- CO
- Weld County
- 5/12/25
- 05/12/2025
- 184 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The recent Greeley-Evans District 6 School Board meeting concentrated on evaluating the future of the district’s facilities, weighing the costs and implications of renovating the current district office against constructing a new building. The board discussed the deteriorating state of the existing 70-year-old building, with issues like flooding risks and outdated systems, estimating a renovation cost of approximately $23 million, which might underestimate the potential for hidden problems. In contrast, constructing a new building, including demolition and other associated costs, would amount to about $48 million. The urgency of this decision was underscored by the opportunity for the district to partner with the city and county for downtown development, which could be a unique chance to secure a desirable location without incurring land purchase costs. The board recognized the financial challenge, considering the district’s budget constraints and deferred maintenance on other aging facilities.