- Filters
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 4/14/25
- 04/14/2025
- 80 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Cranbury Township Committee meeting on April 14, 2025, addressed several issues, including police department operations, the donation of a sculpture by the Helen Cody Foundation, and community engagement strategies.
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 4/10/25
- 04/10/2025
- 64 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Cranbury Shade Tree Commission meeting focused on the challenges of enforcing its tree removal replacement ordinance, the lack of clear communication with residents, and the need for improved internal processes. The commission discussed the necessity of hiring an arborist, amending application processes, and clarifying the ordinance’s impact on private property.
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 4/7/25
- 04/07/2025
- 12 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Cranbury Board of Health appointed Dr. Madsby as the new township veterinarian during the recent meeting. Members also discussed issues related to animal licensing compliance and provided an update on health facility vaccination metrics.
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 4/3/25
- 04/03/2025
- 97 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Cranbury Planning Board meeting addressed several issues, including the approval of a billboard relocation on Brickyard Road and a notable resignation from a long-serving board member. The board also discussed amendments to the Historic Preservation Commission’s master plan and touched on procedural matters concerning the zoning committee’s future meetings.
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 3/24/25
- 03/24/2025
- 54 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Cranbury Township Committee meeting brought the historic Dancer House on Plainsboro Road into sharp focus, as tensions rose over its potential demolition or neglect. Members of the Cranbury Historical and Preservation Society, led by Mark Bowski, voiced their concerns during the public comment section, emphasizing the house’s historical significance and the society’s long-standing commitment to preservation efforts. Despite previous attempts to address the issue in October and March, the society felt sidelined as their request to discuss the matter at the meeting was denied, citing their non-township entity status. The committee now faces pressure to respect the historic preservation easement and engage in meaningful dialogue with preservationists to prevent any irreversible decisions.