- Filters
- NJ
- Monmouth County
- 7/22/25
- 07/23/2025
- 77 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Fair Haven Historic Preservation Commission’s recent meeting saw the approval of new signage for two businesses on River Road, addressing audio-visual challenges during meetings, and discussions on a historical transom and paint protocols.
- NJ
- Monmouth County
- 7/14/25
- 07/15/2025
- 72 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Fair Haven Borough Council meeting focused on revising the tree removal ordinance, addressing challenges posed by New Jersey American Water’s infrastructure work, and deliberating on various municipal projects, including urgent paving needs and drainage improvements.
- NJ
- Monmouth County
- 7/10/25
- 07/14/2025
- 202 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent Fair Haven Zoning Board meeting, discussions centered on a property development proposal that raised questions about compliance with zoning regulations and neighborhood impact. Concerns included the size of the proposed structure, its compatibility with community standards, and potential environmental effects. The board debated several aspects of the proposal, including variances, accessory structures, and detailed landscaping plans.
- NJ
- Monmouth County
- 7/9/25
- 07/10/2025
- 45 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Fair Haven Environmental Commission gathered to address issues, including the use of pesticides in local parks and the advancement of community sustainability practices. Key topics included the transparency of pesticide applications, collaboration with local businesses on sustainable practices, and the potential for living shoreline projects to combat climate change impacts.
- NJ
- Monmouth County
- 06/25/2025
- 92 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: At the recent Fair Haven Historic Preservation Commission meeting, the commission approved a modification for a construction project on Normandy Avenue, which involved converting an attic window into a recessed balcony. The decision came amid discussions about architectural style and neighborhood consistency. The architect, representing homeowner Rhett Federo, argued that the alteration was a minor adjustment and necessary to comply with permit variance requirements. The balcony, designed to offer river views, sparked a debate among commission members over its compatibility with the house’s existing architecture. Ultimately, a suggestion to incorporate a smaller arch detail to blend with the residence’s gable was accepted, and the modification was unanimously approved.