- Filters
- FL
- Polk County
- 3/18/26
- 03/18/2026
- 69 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Winter Haven City Commission meeting was marked by the approval of plans for the highly anticipated Winter Haven Recreation and Cultural Center, which is set to feature numerous community-focused amenities, including a gym, library, weight room, and aquatics area. In a recent session, commission confirmed that no membership fees will be required to access the center.
- FL
- Polk County
- 3/4/26
- 03/04/2026
- 86 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Winter Haven City Commission meeting on March 9, 2026, centered on strategic discussions about bolstering the local economy through tourism enhancements and infrastructure projects. Key topics included a comprehensive presentation on tourism’s economic impact, upcoming legislative advocacy efforts, and plans for community development and infrastructure improvements.
- FL
- Polk County
- 2/23/26
- 02/23/2026
- 102 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During the Winter Haven City Commission meeting, residents voiced concerns over local development transparency and the city’s involvement in the 287G immigration enforcement agreement.
- FL
- Polk County
- 2/18/26
- 02/18/2026
- 39 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Winter Haven City Commission meeting focused on several infrastructure-related initiatives, including the use of Public-Private Partnerships (P3s) for a new parking garage and developments at Bradco Farms, the selection of Wharton Smith for construction projects using the Seymar delivery method, and the purchase of police vehicles. The commission also discussed leasing school buses for summer programs and addressed budget amendments for ongoing projects.
- FL
- Polk County
- 2/9/26
- 02/09/2026
- 76 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: At the Winter Haven City Commission meeting on February 9, 2026, community concerns emerged regarding proposed zoning changes and the city’s contracting practices. Public comments highlighted issues with transparency in communication about community developments and the shift in contractor selection methods, emphasizing the need for local involvement and competitive bidding.