Benton County Board Approves Budget Levy Amid Concerns Over Inmate Costs and Infrastructure Challenges

Overview: In a recent meeting of the Benton County Board of Commissioners, members unanimously approved the proposed budget levy, which includes a notable increase, while also grappling with the financial implications of inmate housing costs and extensive infrastructure projects. The board’s deliberations spanned a range of topics, from setting future levy rates to managing the complexities of road and bridge engineering.

Benton County Board Approves New TIF District Amid Housing Development Plans

Overview: The Benton County Board of Commissioners meeting was marked by the approval of a new Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district for Sauk Rapids, discussions on health insurance plan adjustments, and significant drainage system management debates, particularly regarding County Ditch 10. Additionally, the board addressed the transition to a new food vendor for the county jail and approved a proclamation for National 4-H Week.

Foley City Council Faces Funding Shortfall for Water Treatment Project

Overview: The Foley City Council meeting primarily focused on issues surrounding the city’s infrastructure and financial planning. The most urgent matter was the council’s struggle to secure adequate funding for a significant water treatment project. Federal appropriations fell short of the seven million dollars needed, raising concerns about the project’s feasibility and the financial burden on residents if external support cannot be secured.

Benton County Approves $22.85 Million Lease Revenue Bonds for New Government Center

Overview: The Benton County Board of Commissioners meeting focused on the approval of $22.85 million in lease revenue bonds to finance a new county government center, alongside discussions on solar panel screening, homelessness, and infrastructure maintenance.

Benton County Faces Public Backlash Over New Government Center Financing

Overview: The Benton County Board of Commissioners meeting was marked by public scrutiny over the financing of a new county government center, amid accusations of inadequate transparency and accountability. This project has sparked significant public backlash, with residents criticizing the board for proceeding with construction before the completion of a public hearing on the development plan. Concerns were raised about the project’s timing, financial implications, and the board’s previous commitments to allow a public vote on funding decisions.