- Filters
- MN
- Clay County
- 12/16/25
- 12/16/2025
- 157 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The recent Clay County Board of Commissioners meeting focused on significant salary adjustments for key county positions, including the sheriff and the county attorney, alongside discussions regarding the county’s budget and tax levy for 2026. These topics were interwoven with concerns over property tax burdens, particularly affecting local farmers, and the need for transportation services for seniors.
- MN
- Clay County
- 12/2/25
- 12/02/2025
- 100 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: At the recent meeting of the Clay County Board of Commissioners, attention was devoted to the county’s treatment courts, the allocation of discretionary funds for rehabilitation programs, and the upcoming 2026 budget.
- MN
- Clay County
- 11/25/25
- 11/25/2025
- 346 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The recent meeting of the Clay County Board of Commissioners saw discussions on infrastructure projects, particularly focusing on the FM Metro Railroad needs study and the Minnesota Power Maple River to Cailluna transmission line project. Additionally, budgetary concerns, including proposed changes to regional library funding and economic development allocations, were thoroughly examined.
- MN
- Clay County
- 11/18/25
- 11/18/2025
- 180 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The recent meeting of the Clay County Board of Commissioners was marked by discussions concerning a proposed concrete readymix plant, the approval of a new subdivision, and an early retirement incentive program for county employees. These topics sparked considerable debate among commissioners and community members, reflecting a range of perspectives on land use, financial management, and community development.
- MN
- Clay County
- 11/18/25
- 06/24/2026
- 233 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent meeting, the Clay County Board of Commissioners denied a variance request from Elevated Dispensaries to reduce the residential setback for a proposed cannabis business in Baker, Minnesota. The decision followed extensive public commentary from both proponents and opponents of the project, highlighting community concerns about safety, traffic, and the preservation of the town’s character.