- Filters
- NJ
- Essex County
- 10/29/25
- 10/30/2025
- 24 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: At the recent Livingston Town Council meeting, significant public dissatisfaction emerged as residents criticized local governance and law enforcement, while the council also engaged in community recognition and event planning.
- NJ
- Atlantic County
- 10/29/25
- 10/30/2025
- 84 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Egg Harbor Land Use Board meeting on October 29, 2025, was dominated by discussions surrounding an application from Humble Organic LLC for a use variance and site plan waiver for a proposed cannabis cultivation facility on Atlantic Avenue. The board examined the environmental, logistical, and regulatory implications of the project, as well as broader issues related to similar operations within the town.
- NJ
- Bergen County
- 10/29/25
- 10/29/2025
- 83 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During a recent meeting, the River Edge School Board reviewed the results of the New Jersey Student Learning Assessments (NJSLA), highlighting exceptional student performance in English language arts, mathematics, and science. The meeting also covered curriculum adjustments, budget planning, and strategic goals for the district.
- NJ
- Morris County
- 10/29/25
- 10/30/2025
- 127 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Parsippany-Troy Hills Zoning Board meeting on October 29, 2025, focused heavily on T-Mobile’s application for a minor site plan and variance to install permanent antennas at 1280 US Route 46 East. The application, which aimed to replace a temporary wireless facility on Route 46, raised concerns among board members and the public about technical, visual, and health implications.
- NJ
- Ocean County
- 10/29/25
- 10/29/2025
- 226 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent Jackson Zoning Board meeting, an application for a use variance to allow a commercial operation involving dumpster rental and junkyard removal near protected wetlands was firmly rejected. This decision came after extensive deliberations focusing on environmental safety, regulatory compliance, and community impact. Concerns about potential environmental degradation, noise pollution, and the appropriateness of commercial activities in a predominantly residential and ecologically sensitive area were at the forefront of the debate.