A central topic of discussion was the contamination risk posed by septic systems to private wells and the subsequent liability faced by homeowners. The conversation underscored the importance of a resolution at the state level that could alleviate the legal burden on residents. The board examined the complexities involved in such a legal and regulatory issue, acknowledging the need for clear guidelines to protect public health without unfairly penalizing property owners.

Another point of debate was the treatment of funds received from a lawsuit settlement. The board deliberated on the allocation of these funds into an interest-bearing account, discussing whether the money should be strictly earmarked for granular activated carbon (GAC) costs or if there should be flexibility for other uses. The legality of the allocation and the establishment of criteria for expenditure were also topics of concern, with members seeking clarification from the Town Council. The importance of transparency and accountability was highlighted, especially regarding the strict accounting necessary for compliance in the event of audits.

Capital improvement and system plans were also a focal point, particularly the issue of discolored water. The prioritization of hydrants and the potential inclusion of a hydro model to better understand the water system’s functioning were examined. The need for a new master plan to address completed projects and future endeavors was acknowledged, along with the consideration of booster pumps and tanks in specific areas to improve water pressure. The possibility of collaborating with neighboring towns and the legal capacity to sell water under the Water Management Act were also explored.

The board addressed concerns regarding the water department’s registered and permitted volume, especially the implications of selling water to another town and the potential loss of volume. The feasibility of using a particular parcel of land for a water tank was debated, taking into account its location, ownership, and geological characteristics. A decision was made to relinquish intent for the tank parcel following a roll call vote. The superintendent reported on installations for the Main Street wall, including a generator and a stream gauge mandated by the Department of Environmental Protection to monitor water levels and quality.

Progress on infrastructure projects was reported, with updates on meter installations, waterline replacements, and the construction of a water treatment plant. The board discussed the completion rate of meter installations, ongoing work on Main Street, and the installation of water lines along South Row and Emy Road. The upcoming paving of South Row Road was scheduled to address community concerns. The construction progress of the treatment plant was noted, with the installation of windows, doors, and a new generator. The potential installation of solar panels on the treatment plant’s roof was considered for cost-saving and energy-efficiency benefits.

In response to new EPA regulations and the potential financial strain on residents, the board proposed suspending the service connection fee for existing homes near water lines. The fairness of this decision was debated, considering those who had already paid the fee. Options such as payment plans or reduced fees were discussed to alleviate the financial burden on residents.

The board also reviewed the performance of the ASR system, noting a significant reduction in water usage by residents. Concerns were raised about the impact of reduced usage on the system’s operation and future regulatory compliance. Regular maintenance of wells and the cleaning rotation schedule were discussed to ensure the continued functionality of the system.

Lastly, logistics concerning the approval of reports and bills payable warrants out of session were discussed, given the virtual nature of the meetings. The need for stamps for digital approval of documents was addressed before the meeting adjourned at 8:38 p.m.