15:30The board’s decision to recommend a long-term waste management contract stands out as one of the most consequential actions taken during the meeting. The proposed contract, valued at $493,000, outlines a minimal increase in costs, specifically a $5 increase per ton for fiscal years 2026 and 2027. This contract has been deemed financially favorable for the town, offering a significant reduction in the current expenditure on waste management services. The proposed annual cost of $4,478 reflects a decrease from the existing fee of $8,825, potentially alleviating financial pressure on the town’s budget. The board expressed confidence in the contract’s potential to save taxpayers money, emphasizing the importance of recycling initiatives. One member noted a positive shift in community behavior, remarking that “people are doing a lot more recycling; they’re paying attention to what they’re doing.”

The board recognized the necessity of collaboration with the Select Board, as their approval is required before the contract can be finalized. Plans were made to invite representatives from the contracting firm to a future meeting to address any concerns from the Select Board. The meeting scheduled for February 11th is expected to host Glenn Shaw for final negotiations. Despite not being able to officially sign the contract at this time, the board unanimously agreed to recommend the contract to the Select Board based on the favorable numbers presented.

Concurrently, the meeting addressed a significant leadership transition within the board. One member announced their decision to step down from the chair position due to personal health concerns, stating, “I am not capable of being chair of the board anymore.” This announcement prompted discussions on succession planning and the process of appointing a new chairperson. Members discussed the procedural requirements necessary for appointing a new chair, agreeing to include the vote on the agenda for the next meeting. The departing chair was acknowledged for their contributions and dedication to the community, with members expressing gratitude for their service.

0:01In addition to the contract and leadership discussions, the board also addressed several other pertinent issues. The meeting tackled payables, considering three invoices related to public health operations. These included a $1,254 invoice for mattress disposal from Tough Stuff Recycling, a $45.25 AT&T cell phone bill, and a $67 expense for a smart sign connected to Christmas disposal efforts. The board emphasized the importance of understanding the origin of these expenses while agreeing to approve the invoices.

The board also contemplated future agenda items, such as a proposed discussion on a styrofoam ban, spurred by resident concerns. This discussion had been previously postponed due to the pandemic but is now scheduled for late February. Another topic involves a pesticide that local citizens claim harms wildlife and pets. A brochure on the pesticide is to be distributed for review before the next meeting, where Jim Griffy, the director of the Nashoba Board of Health, is scheduled to provide a state-of-the-agency update.

Furthermore, the board deliberated on the repair of a well at a closed landfill, with an estimated cost of approximately $7,000. The board aims to utilize leftover funds from the landfill operations budget, with potential additional support from the capital account or the general revolving account. The well is critical for monitoring gases, and its collapse has complicated sampling efforts. Compliance with Department of Environmental Protection requirements remains a priority.

Finally, the meeting included discussions on bid proposals for waste collection services, highlighting a new contract proposal with various disposal rates, including a municipal solid waste tip fee of $105 per ton and a recycling tip fee of $125 per ton. The board examined the separation of municipal and resident trash contracts to ensure that taxpayers do not bear the costs associated with municipal trash collection. A request for clarification on the proposals was made, with the understanding that these discussions will continue in upcoming meetings.