The most significant topic was the review and prioritization of the action plan’s goals and objectives. The commission emphasized the need for clarity in categorizing tasks as high, medium, or low priority. High priority was defined as tasks to be addressed within 0 to 3 years, medium within 3 to 7 years, and low beyond 7 years. A consensus emerged that ongoing tasks should be marked as high priority, reflecting their continuous nature, although some members questioned the implications of this classification.

A critical element of the discussion was the protection of private wells from contamination, unanimously agreed to be a high priority due to its essential nature. The development of environmentally friendly septic systems was also debated, leading to its classification as medium priority based on its timeline. The need for public awareness and educational materials, such as brochures for residents, was highlighted, although opinions differed on their prioritization compared to more issues.

The conversation touched on the Conservation Land Fund and its role in land acquisition. Concerns were raised about the fund’s status, prompting a commitment to investigate whether it still exists. The potential impact of the Community Preservation Act (CPA) on funding for conservation efforts was also noted.

The commission explored the development of trails, particularly a project initiated by Ray Jack. Challenges were noted regarding the property’s terrain, requiring significant grading and possibly the construction of a bridge. This project was categorized as high priority.

The establishment of a dedicated page on the town’s website for open space and recreation was also deemed a high priority. The commission discussed the need for an updated forest management plan for Old Meeting House Park, recognizing that the existing plan was approximately ten years old. The importance of having an active management plan for all wooded town properties was underscored.

Further discussions included the role of the Tree Warden in providing educational materials on planting native trees and shrubs, which was identified as a high priority. A shade tree inventory was suggested as a medium priority, aligning with the broader goal of promoting native vegetation.

The commission also addressed the need for a grant writer to seek funding for recreation facility development and repairs. This task was categorized as high priority. The role of the Agricultural Commission was raised, with suggestions to prioritize its establishment due to previous discussions about its formation.

Climate resiliency goals and actions from the 2020 MVP and HMP plan were categorized as ongoing responsibilities, with a focus on tasks such as mosquito control and invasive species removal. However, concerns were expressed about the commission’s role in these tasks.

The need to communicate concerns to Jessica, presumably a liaison or coordinator involved with the MVP plan, was noted. The commission members emphasized their primary role in developing documentation around open space and recreation, rather than implementing on-the-ground management strategies.