The replacement of an existing septic system within the 100-foot buffer on Emory Road, presented by Matthew Maro Environmental Consulting, was a focal point of the meeting. Concerns were raised about the lack of detail for erosion control in the plans. The commission agreed to continue the discussion in the next meeting to ensure adequate measures are in place for erosion protection, grading, and stockpiling of material on-site. The commission contemplated the need for a silt fence and Waddles, especially considering the flat nature of the lot. After deliberation, it was decided that the inclusion of Waddles could be more than satisfactory to address potential erosion due to the flat area. An order of conditions for a property on Emery Road was motioned with special requirements for erosion control detail and a designated stockpile location, subject to a 10-day appeal period before the commencement of work.

Equally pressing was the issue of a deteriorating retaining wall for a property along Vitton Pond Bank. Homeowners brought to attention the wall’s gradual deterioration, which had already caused a patio to sink. The commission recognized the urgency of the situation and requested pictures to better assess the damage. Technical difficulties delayed the retrieval of images, but homeowners provided a thorough explanation of the wall’s construction and its historical degradation. The repair project was discussed extensively, focusing on the reuse of existing materials and the reliance on manual labor to maintain the natural aesthetic of the area. The commission debated the longevity of the proposed repairs and expressed concerns regarding the absence of drainage behind the wall. The need for erosion controls was also a point of discussion, with the commission aiming to facilitate the permitting process while ensuring proper oversight.

A request for determination of applicability for a septic system replacement was also addressed, particularly because it fell within the 100-foot buffer zone but was permissible under a 40B project. The commission inquired about the expected lifespan of the new system and the potential environmental impact. Advances in septic system technology and their implications for longevity were mentioned.

The commission considered a request for determination of applicability for the installation of a 12 by 24 shed on Street. However, the commission took into account the possibility of the area being mapped as a floodplain. A negative determination was issued, with a special condition for erosion control.

Discussions also touched on the broader issues of hazard mitigation and climate action, with the commission debating the scope of their responsibilities in these areas. The potential for volunteer opportunities and the search for a new agent were topics that underscored the commission’s ongoing administrative needs.

Administrative matters were handled, including the approval of previous meeting minutes and the agent report, discussing various building permits, interdepartmental signatures, and various applications and notices. Moreover, the commission reviewed the annual dues notice for fiscal year 2025 and participated in a vote for the payment of these dues.