One notable issue discussed was the town’s budget shortfall, exacerbated by a $300,000 reduction in funding from North Middlesex, a situation made more urgent by the failure of a recent override vote. Concerns about the state’s lack of financial support for mandates were also voiced.

Amid these budgetary constraints, the committee debated the merits of a second override vote, slated for June, as a means to address the deficit. The implications of the override’s success or failure were central to the discussions, with the committee acknowledging that further meetings would be necessary to explore all potential outcomes.

In response to the budget dilemma, the committee discussed the introduction of a trash fee, a topic that sparked debate due to its potential impact on the community. Members recalled past instances of public discontent regarding changes to trash services and expressed concerns about how a new fee would be received. The need for additional staff to manage the fee collection and concerns regarding non-payment were also considered, with the idea of mailing information to every voter in town to promote understanding and participation.

The committee’s financial deliberations extended to public safety funding, as they acknowledged the increasing demands on police and fire services due to the town’s aging population. While emphasizing the importance of maintaining the standard of the town’s schools, the committee recognized the need to balance these concerns with public safety funding.

Economic development emerged as another focal point, with discussions centering around enhancing the historic district and the conversion of industrial land to residential areas. Members highlighted the potential for zoning for industrial use and exploring agricultural avenues as means to bolster town businesses. Ongoing infrastructure projects, such as the rail trail, sidewalk work, and bridge replacements, were noted as key components of business growth, all funded by grants.

The possibility of budget cuts loomed over the meeting, with members discussing contingency plans in the event of an override vote not passing. The implications of cuts to services and staff were considered, especially in relation to union contracts, and the need for a five-year plan that factors in maintenance costs was emphasized.

In a related financial discussion, a reserve fund transfer request for a $10,000 invoice was deliberated, which would leave the account with a limited balance of $1,669. The committee decided to table this request for further review.

The meeting also touched upon the need for proper oversight of department heads’ spending to prevent future budget issues and the rising cost of salt for winter maintenance. The committee stressed the importance of following proper accounting practices to avoid unforeseen expenses throwing the budget off course.

As the meeting concluded, the focus returned to the upcoming town meeting and the need to present a balanced budget, with or without an override. The committee emphasized the importance of being prepared with a plan B, including specific discussions about potential cuts and budget constraints.