Townsend Historic District Commission Plans Appeal Over Trestle’s Exclusion from Historic District Boundaries.
- Meeting Overview:
The Townsend Historic District Commission’s recent meeting was marked by a decision to pursue an appeal regarding a building commissioner’s ruling that a trestle is not within the historic district’s boundaries. The commission also discussed the need for new volunteers with relevant expertise, debated recent contentious issues involving public health projects, and highlighted the importance of establishing a clear violation policy to enforce compliance with preservation standards.
One notable issue during the meeting was the commission’s unanimous decision to appeal the building commissioner’s determination about the trestle. Members of the commission expressed concern that excluding the trestle from the historic district undermines their efforts to preserve the town’s architectural history. The commission proposed allocating $300 to fund the appeal, with discussions about potentially recovering the cost if the zoning board rules in their favor.
In addition to the appeal, the commission grappled with internal challenges, notably the absence of an architect to guide them on technical preservation matters. The lack of professional architectural advice has been a recurring issue, with members recalling the valuable contributions of past advisors like Ken, who provided expertise on materials and preservation techniques. The commission acknowledged the need to recruit new members, particularly those with architectural or real estate backgrounds, to fill this gap. They emphasized the importance of having a well-rounded team to effectively advocate for the district’s preservation needs.
The meeting also featured a heated discussion regarding a recent public health project that proceeded without the board’s prior knowledge. This incident sparked debate over ethical practices in communication and decision-making. One member defended their actions, asserting they had sought essential information to aid the commission’s deliberations. However, the discourse highlighted divisions within the commission about how best to uphold its mission of preserving the town’s historical integrity. This situation, coupled with historical demolitions of significant structures like the West Townsend Woman’s Seminary and the original fire station, raised questions about the commission’s future efficacy if it cannot effectively advocate for preservation.
Concerns about adherence to the district’s demolishing rules were also prominent, particularly as new residents express desires to alter their properties. The commission noted that while interior changes are generally permissible, exterior modifications require careful scrutiny to maintain historical authenticity. A past incident involving an investor named May Wong, who attempted to demolish a barn without proper permissions, was recounted as an example of challenges in enforcing existing rules. Although the building commissioner, identified as Erin Shan, diligently monitored Wong’s activities, the commission’s inability to impose fines highlighted frustrations over enforcement capabilities.
The meeting also addressed the need for economic growth within the historic district, recognizing the challenges faced by new businesses. A specific case was mentioned where a business owner encountered obstacles after investing in property modifications, only to be informed by the commission that certain requirements could not be met. This situation underscored the need for a clear policy framework to guide future decisions and ensure alignment with state laws.
As the meeting progressed, the commission revisited the topic of recruiting new volunteers. Three candidates—James Dorian, Maria Milikin, and Jennifer Ravallet—were identified as potential new members. The commission discussed each candidate’s background, emphasizing the importance of finding individuals with the requisite knowledge and commitment to the tasks at hand. One member suggested inviting these candidates to future meetings to assess their intentions and fit for the commission.
A key administrative task undertaken during the meeting was obtaining signatures on a decision made the previous week regarding the approval of a farmhouse project. This procedural requirement highlighted the commission’s ongoing efforts to ensure all actions are properly documented and in compliance with regulations. Additionally, the establishment of a violation policy was deemed necessary to enforce compliance with preservation standards, with members stressing the importance of informing applicants about requirements before commencing work.
Eric Slagle
Historic Preservation Commission Officials:
Eino Kauppi, Susan R. Gerken, Clare Kauppi, MaryJane Churchville, Jerrilyn Bozicas
-
Meeting Type:
Historic Preservation Commission
-
Committee:
-
Meeting Date:
06/12/2025
-
Recording Published:
06/14/2025
-
Duration:
34 Minutes
-
Notability Score:
Routine
Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:
-
State:
Massachusetts
-
County:
Middlesex County
-
Towns:
Townsend
Recent Meetings Nearby:
- 12/11/2025
- 12/12/2025
- 125 Minutes
- 12/11/2025
- 12/11/2025
- 190 Minutes
- 12/11/2025
- 12/12/2025
- 54 Minutes