21:59A significant part of the meeting involved the board’s decision to withdraw the pre-approval application for the MBTA multifamily overlay district. This decision followed concerns from the Massachusetts Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities (EOHLC) regarding the inclusion of landlocked lots without frontage. The EOHLC hesitated to provide a pre-approval letter, fearing it might set a precedent for other communities attempting to create similar unbuildable districts. The Planning Board discussed withdrawing the application to avoid an unfavorable written decision, suggesting that landlocked lots might become accessible if ownership changes occur, thus resolving the issue autonomously.

16:07Board members debated whether to modify the district by only including lots with frontage or maintain the current configuration. The choice was between creating a compliant district with fewer lots or preserving the district’s current layout, which could foster a more integrated neighborhood design. Some members argued for the original district to support diverse community layouts and mixed housing types, while others favored a more straightforward approach to avoid future complications. The discussion reflected varying visions for the district’s future, weighing administrative ease against the potential for a well-integrated community.

27:15A related concern involved the lack of common ownership among property owners in the proposed overlay district. The board noted that zoning regulations typically do not address property ownership specifics, emphasizing that ownership and easement discussions should not involve direct intervention from the Planning Board. Instead, they proposed an information session to educate property owners about the new MBTA communities district, stressing the importance of transparency and communication.

35:56The board also tackled procedural aspects of notifying property owners about zoning changes, debating the need for public hearings and the logistics of scheduling them. Potential dates for public hearings were considered, with a preference for April 14th to ensure all members could attend.

56:20Another focal point was the ongoing discussion about affordable housing initiatives in Townsend. Concerns were raised about the effectiveness of current zoning practices in serving elderly and low-income residents. While some argued that developments like a 55-plus housing community allow local seniors to downsize without leaving the area, others questioned the affordability of such units for low-income residents.

47:35The meeting also reviewed the status of existing affordable housing initiatives, citing “Towns and Woods,” which took seven years to develop and resulted in 36 affordable units. Despite this achievement, there remains a significant waiting list.

01:24:51On a different note, the board discussed an application process for accessory dwelling units (ADUs), focusing on the need for clear communication and permit requirements. The highway department’s involvement was noted, particularly regarding driveway permits and their impact on scenic road designations. The board agreed on the importance of notifying the highway department about changes necessitating new driveways, emphasizing emergency management concerns like clear house numbering for safety.

01:32:54The meeting concluded with a review of public hearing notices from neighboring towns and a recap of a recent citizen planner training conference. The conference provided insights into development processes and community involvement, highlighting the value of diverse stakeholder perspectives. The board expressed interest in accessing presentation materials from the conference to enhance their understanding and approach to planning challenges.