Townsend Select Board Debates Financial Viability of New Waste Management Program

At the Townsend Select Board meeting on May 22, 2025, discussions centered on the financial sustainability and implementation of a new waste management program. The board considered the establishment of a curbside solid waste recycling enterprise fund, aimed at segregating its revenues and expenses from the town’s operating budget. This proposal included maintaining the current flat fee of $125 per household for the Pay As You Throw (PAYT) program, with an initial allocation of $160,000 from the stabilization fund to support the initiative. The conversation highlighted concerns about the program’s reliance on these funds and the need for a community vote to proceed.

34:51A point of discussion revolved around the financial implications of the proposed waste management program, particularly its reliance on stabilization funds. Participants expressed apprehension about using these funds, citing risks of creating future funding shortfalls. Some proposed increasing the household fee to $200 as an alternative to avoid tapping into the stabilization funds, while others argued against significant fee hikes, emphasizing the potential burden on residents. The board was urged to ensure that the program’s revenue streams could sustain its costs without compromising town finances. Concerns were raised about how an increase in fees might push residents toward private waste services, thereby reducing participation in the town’s program.

15:02The debate extended to the specifics of the trash collection contract with Shaw, the service provider. Questions were raised about negotiating better terms, considering the program would only cover a fraction of the town’s waste collection needs. Participants stressed the importance of aligning the collection rates with the services provided to avoid unnecessary financial strain on the town.

Another recurring theme was the need for clear financial projections and a comprehensive understanding of the cash flow dynamics involved in the program. Participants called for detailed numerical analyses and month-to-month projections, emphasizing the importance of transparency in financial planning to prevent potential fiscal deficits. The board was urged to refrain from relying on one-time revenues for ongoing expenses, a practice that could jeopardize the town’s financial health.

01:12:52During the meeting, issues were also raised about the proposed sticker program, which would require residents to register and pay an annual fee for waste collection. Concerns were voiced over the feasibility of implementing the program within the planned timeline, particularly without the necessary written confirmations from stakeholders. The proposed system would involve distributing stickers to participating households.

01:05:59Additionally, the meeting addressed the complexities of enforcing the new fee structure, particularly for rental properties. Questions were raised about how the Board of Health would manage fee collection from property owners, many of whom reside out of state. The board was urged to ensure effective communication with property owners about their responsibilities under the new system.

39:55The financial viability of the program was further scrutinized through comparisons with private waste management services. Calculations presented at the meeting suggested that the cost of using the town’s purple bags was competitive with Shaw’s rates. However, concerns were expressed that as fees increased, residents might opt for private services, thereby diminishing participation in the town’s program.

53:58The need for public engagement was emphasized, with calls for transparency and community input in the decision-making process. The board was encouraged to present the proposed changes at an upcoming town meeting, allowing residents to voice their opinions and concerns. The importance of educating residents about the program and the rationale behind the changes was underscored.

01:38:27In other discussions, the board addressed encroachment issues at Dudley Meadows, a town-owned property. The Conservation Commission sought to address these issues, pending clarification on their jurisdiction over the land. The board agreed to conduct further research and revisit the matter at a future meeting.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: