The meeting’s most issue was the debate over the use of second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides, known as “seagars.” A representative from the Board of Health presented comprehensive research on the detrimental impacts these chemicals have on local wildlife and the ecosystem. Designed to kill rodents by preventing blood clotting, these rodenticides result in prolonged deaths not only for targeted pests but also for non-target species such as birds of prey and other mammals. The persistence of these chemicals in soil and water compounds the environmental risks, with the National Pesticide Information Center providing data on breakdown rates.

Town residents and the Board of Health urged the Select Board to consider a policy banning these rodenticides on town property, citing similar actions by neighboring communities. Concerns were heightened by reports of poisoned wildlife, including bald eagles and hawks, and statistics from wildlife rehabilitation clinics.

The Select Board engaged in dialogue to schedule a joint meeting with the Board of Health to discuss the proposed policy further. They agreed on a meeting date and committed to drafting a response to the Board of Health’s letter by the requested deadline. The urgency of addressing this issue was underscored by the upcoming contract renewal with the pest control service.

In parallel, the Select Board faced budgetary considerations following the failure of an override vote intended to provide additional funding for town services. Members expressed the need to present a balanced budget at the upcoming town meeting. The urgency was compounded by the scheduling of the town meeting just a week after this discussion. Conversations touched on potential budget cuts and their implications, with a focus on transparency while adhering to legal constraints.

The school budget remained unresolved due to the failed override, with potential ramifications for the fiscal planning of local schools. The board acknowledged the need to address this at the town meeting, noting the scheduling of similar meetings in neighboring towns. Discussions alluded to the possibility of rejecting the proposed school assessment, which would necessitate reevaluation by the school district.

Governance transitions were another focal point, with a newly elected member acknowledging the challenges of acclimating to their role shortly after the election. The Select Board recognized these challenges and expressed a desire to revisit the town’s charter and electoral processes to enhance the experience for future members.

The board also reviewed various town policies, identifying several in need of updates. Outdated policies were flagged, and a systematic approach to revising them was proposed. The discussion included policies dating back many years and the need for clarity and consistency moving forward.

Facility rental policies were scrutinized, particularly regarding the responsibilities of renters and the facilities department. The need for a checklist accompanying rental agreements was emphasized to ensure renters leave facilities in good condition. Amendments were proposed to specify parking restrictions and emergency contact procedures during rentals.

The meeting concluded with discussions on the military leave policy and the town’s affordable housing trust. The military leave policy was considered for alignment with state law, offering more extensive leave for those serving in the National Guard or Reserves. Concerns about budget implications and procedural requirements were noted.