Further complicating the investment decision was the discussion of adopting The Prudent Investment Rule, an approach that would require the board to explore different investment options to maximize returns. The board considered the ramifications of accepting money from companies currently facing lawsuits due to the introduction of chemicals into the water supply.

The discussion of the water department’s master plan revealed the commissioners’ emphasis on infrastructure maintenance and replacement. Recognizing the inevitability of unexpected issues, the board considered the importance of having a robust maintenance plan. There was also a proposal to include education and outreach initiatives in the master plan, specifically targeting students in the area to raise awareness and potentially guide them towards careers in the water sector. This led to a suggestion of a program that would introduce high school students to the water industry, offering internships and career exposure.

Contractual needs for executing the master plan also surfaced as a point of concern. The commissioners debated whether a single designated signatory should be responsible for signing warrants or if all commissioners should be involved. This decision bore implications for operational efficiency and accountability within the water department’s administration.

The quality of water provided to residents was another major focus of the meeting. The board addressed incidents of discolored water resulting from broken lines and agreed on the necessity of posting a notice on the Water Department’s Facebook page, as well as issuing a warning regarding the use of water post-activation of irrigation systems. The change in water testing services provoked unease among the board members due to missed samples, delayed notifications, and the new service provider’s handling of positive test results. Additionally, the elimination of wastewater certifications was lamented, as it left smaller water operator systems without support.

Updates on construction projects, including the installation of water lines and upcoming testing and operational plans, were provided. The board touched upon the delay of the generator and upgrades for the skater system. The operational efficiency of the water department and the reliability of the water supply infrastructure were clearly a priority, as evidenced by the discussions surrounding these projects.

Public comments delved into the technology used for water line installation and the financial implications of the proposed system development charge, a topic that is scheduled for further discussion in the board’s next meeting in June. The board also agreed to review monthly abatements and adjustment lists, approve end-of-month reports, and adjourned the meeting at 7:47 pm.