0:00The board spent a portion of the meeting deliberating on the necessity of a master plan for the water system, which includes a new hydro model and cybersecurity components. These elements are considered vital for the ongoing Lunenburg Road tank project. The board acknowledged that changes in system flow dynamics, due to infrastructure developments, necessitated a thorough reassessment to improve efficiency and manage water flow and pressure. A budget proposal of $75,000 was discussed to cover the costs, with $60,000 earmarked for the master plan and $10,000 for cybersecurity, plus a contingency fund.

22:33Concerns were raised about the substantial financial commitment required for the master plan, estimated at $775,000, with some members questioning its necessity. The conversation highlighted a pressing deadline to secure funding through the Town Meeting by March 1st. The board was cautious about using the $280,000 in free cash reserves, preferring to explore alternative funding options, including grants, although none were currently available for the hydro model. The urgency of understanding the status of previously identified MBTE-related emergency funds was emphasized, as these could alleviate some financial challenges.

The board’s discussions also took a notable turn toward cybersecurity, propelled by recent EPA directives. There was consensus on the need to complete cybersecurity audits within the current year, despite concerns over potential costs. Members expressed a strong desire for a detailed proposal from Tyan Bond, outlining specific costs and activities, before authorizing funds. The potential to cover cybersecurity audits with federal assistance was also considered.

The board expressed a strong desire for clarity on project costs and requirements, emphasizing the importance of responsible fiscal management. An emergency meeting was suggested to finalize decisions on the warrant article funding the hydro model and cybersecurity measures, with hopes of a timely response from Tyan Bond to meet the March 1 deadline.

1:05:05In parallel, the board debated the logistics of selling water to neighboring communities, a proposal that would require careful consideration of billing structures and rate applications. Discussions highlighted the variability in water rates and potential economic impacts on Townsend. The board considered treating large-scale customers, like neighboring towns, similarly to Sterilite or local schools, with entrance fees and tiered rate structures. The importance of maintaining equitable treatment and supporting community needs was a recurring theme.

1:26:40The board also addressed operational issues within the water department, including staffing challenges stemming from an impending medical leave. The decision to create a temporary non-bargaining unit position led to tensions with the union, which viewed the move as establishing a permanent role. The board insisted on the temporary nature of the position, citing budgetary provisions and operational needs. The ongoing negotiations with the union were marked by a desire for clearer communication and resolution, with members expressing frustration over the union’s stance.