Traffic generation was a central topic, with debate over the adequacy of existing traffic studies and the need for new assessments. Concerns were raised about the validity of traffic data from a study conducted over 20 years ago, given the substantial growth in the area since then. One participant pointed out that the last traffic assessment dated back to 2000 or 2001, highlighting the need for current data to accurately reflect present conditions. Discussions emphasized the importance of considering traffic patterns outside traditional business hours and the cumulative effects of surrounding developments on local traffic.

The board was reminded that the purpose of the traffic study was to compare the traffic implications of the proposed residential development with those of an already approved office building. It was noted that the previous office development had established traffic volumes and impact fees paid to the county. However, concerns persisted about whether the current analysis accounted for increased traffic over the past decade and whether the proposed development’s traffic generation would indeed be less than that of the previously approved office space.

Further deliberations centered on the scope of the traffic study. Some members suggested implementing an automatic traffic recorder for a week-long period to gather continuous data. Others debated the necessity of including additional intersections in the study, balancing thorough data collection with practical implications of costs and efforts involved. Ultimately, there was a consensus that an updated traffic study was warranted due to the lack of recent data and observed traffic increases in the area.

Water usage was another issue, with discussions focusing on the proposed development’s impact on local water supply and sewage treatment capabilities. The conversation highlighted the difference between water usage calculations based on bedrooms versus individuals, referencing New Jersey state regulations.

Concerns were raised about the adequacy of information available to the board for making an informed decision regarding the development proposal. Questions emerged about the traffic studies conducted for the area, with one participant querying whether traffic assessments were based solely on the development itself or if they considered the surrounding traffic conditions. It was noted that the traffic studies were predicated on the volume approved for previous uses of the property.

A focus was placed on the implications of low-income housing within the development. Discussions elaborated that the law prohibits preference for local residents and mandates a regional approach, with a lottery system for applicants. The specifics of the regional requirements were reviewed, with an emphasis on ensuring compliance with state law for affordable housing.

Parking logistics were also a point of contention. It was noted that each unit would have designated driveways, with some potentially using garages for storage instead of parking. Concerns were raised about overflow parking and the adequacy of parking spaces provided relative to the number of units. The engineer clarified that the parking requirements were based on the Residential Site Improvement Standards (RSIS), which dictate specific allocations for two-bedroom and three-bedroom units. The proposed development was said to include 60 parking spaces, exceeding the mandated requirements.

The discussion also touched on the eviction process for tenants, particularly in the context of the proposed housing development. It was noted that eviction procedures can vary based on the reason for eviction, with non-payment of rent potentially leading to quicker proceedings compared to issues like noise complaints or property violations. The responsibilities of landlords concerning complaints from neighbors were also discussed, emphasizing that enforcement of such issues falls under local authorities’ jurisdiction.

The members expressed a desire to ensure that the development would be beneficial not just in terms of housing but also in promoting a safe and active community environment.