The subject of impact fees was a focal point during the meeting, with residents voicing strong opinions on the need for such fees to prevent new developments from overburdening existing infrastructure. Cara Sim clarified the role of impact fees as one-time charges on new developments aimed at funding necessary infrastructure improvements. She criticized Treasure Island’s current lack of these fees, contrasting it with neighboring areas that successfully implement them for projects like transportation, sewer, and stormwater management. Sim advocated for an impact fee study, emphasizing its importance for the city’s infrastructure sustainability. The study could take up to a year and would involve consulting engineering firms. She encouraged residents to attend planning and zoning meetings to stay informed about developments.

Another item was the beach renourishment project, estimated to cost around $126 million, with funding sourced from Pinellas County’s bed tax. However, unresolved easements from property owners presented challenges, with eleven owners yet to provide consent. Without these easements, dune areas adjacent to certain properties may not receive the same level of protection, raising concerns about potential flooding. The discussions about the project also touched on environmental sustainability, with some residents advocating for natural stabilization methods like boulders instead of importing sand. This approach aimed to minimize ecological disruption while effectively maintaining the beach’s stability.

The Treasure Bay facility also sparked debate, focusing on its restoration and future use. The facility has been severely impacted by hurricanes, necessitating significant repairs, including to its clubhouse and tennis courts. Discussions about the facility’s future highlighted the community’s deep connection to its amenities, such as the golf course and tennis courts. Residents expressed strong support for restoring the golf course, citing its historical significance and community value. They referenced studies and surveys indicating a majority preference for retaining the golf course, along with financial data showing improved revenue streams in recent years. The discourse also included the importance of proper management and funding allocation, with suggestions for creating a strategic plan to guide the facility’s development.

The commission also discussed the hiring of a specialized consulting firm for disaster financial recovery services. This decision was met with both support and skepticism. Some officials questioned the need for external consultants shortly after appointing a full-time grant writer, citing concerns about potential overspending. Proponents argued that the complex nature of grant applications warranted expert assistance to secure federal funding effectively. The city manager emphasized the need for a structured approach to post-disaster recovery, balancing immediate needs with long-term planning.

Public safety and infrastructure were further addressed, with discussions on the need for a new public safety building and improved permitting processes. Residents expressed frustration over the current permitting system, particularly its complexity and costs, which have led to delays and confusion. Suggestions for streamlining the process were made, with a focus on ensuring it supports both new construction and renovation efforts without imposing undue burdens on homeowners.

Residents repeatedly called for transparency, accountability, and an inclusive approach to planning and development. They emphasized the importance of aligning the city’s strategic goals with community needs, advocating for responsible fiscal management and environmental stewardship.