The most pressing topic at the meeting was the “Elevate TI” initiative, which aims to address sea level rise and stormwater management. Many residents expressed frustration over the handling of public comments and the rigid adherence to procedural rules, which they felt limited their ability to voice concerns. The mayor repeatedly clarified the procedural rules, emphasizing that discussions on “Elevate TI” should be reserved for the workshop segment, leading to significant confusion and dissatisfaction among attendees.

Cara Sim raised a procedural issue, questioning the clarity of the meeting agenda and advocating for the right of residents to address the commission freely. She emphasized that the non-agenda section should allow residents to speak on any topic and detailed her skepticism about the need for “Elevate TI.” Sim suggested the city focus on creating a rebate program for residents who had already undertaken elevation projects and advocated for more inclusive surveys and focus groups to gather community input.

Greg Smith addressed the commission, expressing skepticism about the financial feasibility of the proposed elevation projects. He highlighted the staggering cost of elevating 24 miles of road, estimated at $250 million, and stressed the disconnect between aspirations for elevation and the financial realities that could burden taxpayers. Smith’s comments reflected broader concerns about municipal transparency and the prioritization of infrastructure projects.

Public comments also highlighted urgent infrastructure issues, particularly concerning sewage management and the status of the master lift station project. One resident expressed concerns about sewage leaks and urged the commission to prioritize this issue, emphasizing the need for immediate action to prevent a “major problem.” The resident’s comments underscored a growing frustration with the perceived lack of progress on infrastructure improvements.

The meeting also included a discussion regarding the proposed amendment to the micromobility ordinance, specifically addressing the prohibition of micromobility devices on sidewalks throughout the city. Steve Edwards, a longtime resident and experienced runner and cyclist, shared his insights on the issue, expressing concerns about the safety implications of allowing these devices on sidewalks. After Edwards concluded his comments, a motion was made to approve the proposed ordinance change, with commissioners acknowledging the concerns raised.

A public hearing on a variance request for a property located on Bayshore Drive was another focal point of the meeting. The applicant proposed to reduce the density of a potential new construction project by splitting an unplatted lot into two single-family homes rather than developing four multifamily units. Despite the Planning and Zoning Board’s recommendation for approval, city staff recommended denying the variance requests based on a lack of “unnecessary hardship” and failure to meet specific criteria outlined in the regulations. The commission’s discussion revealed a leaning towards the practical benefits of reducing density, but debate persisted regarding the interpretation of the zoning code.

Further discussions centered on the complexities of flood management, particularly the implications of using fill dirt and stormwater management regulations. The dialogue revealed a divergence of opinions regarding the impact of fill on floodplain management and insurance implications under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). A participant emphasized that excessive fill could jeopardize flood insurance availability in the community. The commission acknowledged the need for more clarity and further deliberation on this issue.

The meeting also addressed the status of the Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) and related flood mitigation efforts. The LMS is a countywide hazard mitigation plan that includes initiatives such as reconstructing public safety facilities and addressing seawall repairs. A significant concern was raised regarding the dramatic decline in the number of flood insurance policies in force in Treasure Island, prompting inquiries about potential reasons for this drop.