The centerpiece of the meeting was a discussion on the Treasure Island vulnerability assessment. This assessment, funded by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, was presented by a representative from the public works department. Over the course of the year, a consultant undertook a analysis to identify areas of the city most susceptible to flooding, focusing on fixed infrastructure and low-lying areas. The assessment, spanning future planning horizons of 2040, 2070, and 2100, modeled multiple flood scenarios, including sea level rise, storm surges, and rainfall-based flooding. The most vulnerable areas identified included Sunset Vista, 88th Avenue, and Sunset Beach, with infrastructure such as lift stations, fire, police, and emergency medical services at significant risk.

In response to the assessment’s findings, the city was advised to prioritize strengthening critical facilities, improving evacuation routes, and implementing adaptive infrastructure solutions. The commission discussed urgent priorities, including the causeway and drainage issues at Sunset Beach. An innovative flood-proofing product for control boxes was mentioned as part of possible solutions. The funding and prioritization of safety facilities were also debated, with the assessment serving as a key precursor for grant applications to address these needs.

Residents voiced strong concerns over the city’s infrastructure, particularly in the aftermath of hurricane impacts. One resident highlighted frustration over perceived delays in addressing critical projects, emphasizing the need for timely action given the potential for future hurricanes. This sentiment was echoed by another resident who questioned the status and communication regarding seawall and public safety facilities projects. A budget of $850,000 for miscellaneous seawall repairs was noted, though there was uncertainty if this amount covered all necessary repairs.

Budgetary matters were another focal point, with discussions revealing 13 identified city priorities from April 2025, only one of which had been completed. The city’s financial management came under scrutiny, with a resident questioning the city’s $50 million budget compared to similar towns with lower budgets. The commission acknowledged the need for clear financial discipline, particularly in relation to rising personnel costs and capital projects.

Community engagement was highlighted through a $100,000 grant from Volunteer Florida for “WE Care for Treasure Island,” a habitat restoration project led by Keep Pinellas Beautiful. This initiative aims to involve local residents in education, restoration, and community activities across vulnerable beach access points.

During public comments, concerns about transparency and communication were prevalent. Residents expressed frustration over the lack of response to inquiries and the procedural barriers to participating meaningfully in meetings. Suggestions were made to extend public comment periods and revisit submission deadlines to facilitate broader community involvement.

The commission also tackled the contentious issue of property maintenance, particularly the need for a full-time position to address neglected properties. This position was debated for its potential temporary nature, with suggestions for regular reviews to assess its necessity. The commission emphasized the need for community cooperation, acknowledging challenges in getting compliance from property owners.

In a separate agenda item, the commission authorized a letter of agreement with the Florida State University Institute of Government to review the city’s records inventory. They also moved forward with a request for qualifications for master planning services related to the Treasure Island commercial redevelopment master plan project.

The meeting concluded with reflections on the city’s accomplishments and ongoing projects. The mayor highlighted collaborative efforts, emphasizing financial strategies such as establishing a reserve fund, transitioning trash services, and progressing on land development regulations. Acknowledging community concerns, the commission committed to addressing infrastructure issues and improving communication with residents.