20:16The primary highlight of the meeting was the commission’s unanimous decision to approve a resolution waiving permit and plan examination fees for repairs or demolitions linked to storm damage. The waiver, retroactive to September 27, 2024, covers both residential and commercial properties, offering a financial reprieve for those affected by the hurricanes. The resolution, numbered 20253, also included provisions for reimbursing previously collected fees.

0:28However, the conversation delved deeper into the specifics of the fee waivers. A commissioner raised queries about the inclusion of permits for complete demolition, structure elevation, and new home construction post-demolition. Staff clarified that the resolution primarily addressed full demolition permits, excluding new constructions and elevations from the fee waiver. This prompted a debate on whether to expedite processes for residents eager to return to their homes or to reconsider additional fee waivers for new builds and elevations. There was a call to reevaluate these aspects, recognizing residents’ financial pressures and the need for clarity on substantial damage notices.

The mayor and other commissioners expressed a preference to retain the resolution’s current form, citing the urgency of implementation. They acknowledged that delaying the decision could complicate the rebate process, as many residents awaited the resolution’s passage to proceed with permits. A follow-up discussion was scheduled for February 18 to further address fee considerations for home elevations and new constructions. The commission agreed to hold a workshop to evaluate these issues, balancing immediate resident support with regulatory requirements.

20:16The meeting also covered the terrain modification program revisions, with a proposed expenditure of $31,700 for modifications to ordinances and manuals. This proposal, stemming from recommendations by the Local Planning Agency, was intended to assist residents in areas like Sunset Beach who needed to elevate their homes. The funding was to be drawn from the stormwater fund, despite its exclusion from the fiscal year 2025 budget.

A commissioner voiced concerns over the timing of this expenditure. They proposed delaying the decision to March 18, reflecting on years of discussions around the issue. This viewpoint faced opposition, with others emphasizing the necessity of the program for resident support and advocating for immediate action. The discussion revealed differing opinions on whether to advance the proposal or delay it until the new commission could weigh in.

Public comments further highlighted discontent over the commission’s handling of the terrain modification issue. A resident criticized the staff and commission for not adequately addressing resident needs, referencing a past meeting where public voices were reportedly sidelined. They argued against significant expenditures at this juncture, especially with impending commission changes. Another public commenter sought clarity on the status of a fill dirt mandate, questioning its apparent delay.

The motion to approve the $31,700 expenditure for terrain modification revisions was put to a vote. The commission’s response was mixed, reflecting diverging views on the necessity and timing of the proposal. Some commissioners supported the revisions as essential for addressing resident needs, while others expressed reservations about proceeding without further consideration.