The primary topic of discussion was the proposed amendments to increase density in the city’s zoning districts, particularly within the Resort Facilities Medium (RFM30) and Resort Facilities High (RFH50) zones. The amendments would allow density to rise dramatically from current levels, with RFM30 potentially increasing from 30 units per acre to 125 units per acre and RFH50 also seeing an increase to 125 units per acre. These changes are part of a broader plan to introduce density and intensity standards in line with the countywide plan.

Board members and residents expressed concerns about the potential impact of these increases on the community. The dialogue highlighted fears that such developments could alter the unique character of Treasure Island, with residents like Marie Barbara describing the proposed density increases as “insulting.” Barbara pointed out that the proposed changes could exacerbate existing issues with traffic and infrastructure, citing a 733% increase in density for some areas.

The potential height increase for buildings, particularly in resort areas, was another focal point. The board discussed raising the maximum building height from 60 feet to 80 feet, with allowances for additional height due to terrain modifications. This change could enable structures as tall as 88 feet. Such increases aim to attract development and economic growth, but community members and board members expressed concerns about maintaining the community’s character and infrastructure.

Some residents, like Eric Nory, argued that development would enhance the city’s appeal and address the current state of disrepair. Conversely, others like Cheryl Swain and Marco voiced their apprehension, emphasizing the need for public involvement and cautioning against development that prioritizes profit over community values.

The discussion also touched on the implications of recent legislative changes that limit local referenda on land use regulation changes. This legal context complicates efforts for residents to influence the planning process through voting, as the state now requires adherence to state processes over local referenda.

Another topic was the proposed amendments to the land development regulations, which aim to align with countywide standards and address issues such as traffic and coastal hazards. The board emphasized the necessity of conducting impact studies and updating infrastructure to support the proposed increases in density. This includes considerations for traffic management and ensuring adequate evacuation routes in the event of hurricanes.

The agency’s discussions highlighted a tension between facilitating development and maintaining community character. While there is a recognized need for economic growth and revitalization, many participants advocated for a balanced approach that considers long-term implications and respects the existing community dynamics.