The meeting opened with the city manager highlighting the city’s strategy for tackling the aftermath of the hurricanes. The city manager explained that increased inspection teams had enabled the completion of around 720 inspections out of the required 2,200. Despite this progress, residents were still unable to return to their homes. The city was using a hybrid process, issuing permits while conducting substantial damage assessments to expedite recovery.

Central to the meeting was the debate between two options for conducting damage assessments. Option one proposed a comprehensive evaluation of properties before allowing repairs, while option two allowed residents to begin repairs immediately, with the caveat that repairs might be deemed unnecessary if substantial damage was later determined. The city manager highlighted potential repercussions from FEMA if protocols were not followed, which could risk the city’s participation in the National Flood Insurance Program.

Concerns were raised about the pace of the current process, with a commissioner noting that option two would allow residents to start repairs without delay. However, this option required residents to sign affidavits acknowledging the risk of wasted expenditures if their property was later found to have substantial damage. Some commission members supported option two, arguing that it was more beneficial for the community, despite the potential for increased scrutiny during FEMA audits.

The city attorney weighed in, emphasizing the importance of compliance with FEMA regulations to avoid severe consequences, such as being excluded from the National Flood Insurance Program. The attorney cited examples from other communities that suffered due to non-compliance.

Public comments revealed a mix of confusion and frustration among residents and business owners. Business owner Clyde Smith stressed the urgency of processing permits, given the broader impact on the community.

The meeting also addressed the ongoing inspections, with Director Yunan clarifying the process for handling inspection data. The city anticipated weekly data submissions from contractors, tied to the state division of emergency management. This data would be used to prioritize permit reviews and issue determination letters.

The commission debated extending the waiver for permit fees, which was set to expire at the end of November. There was a consensus on the need for additional staffing to manage the high volume of applications and inspections, with suggestions for running shifts to accommodate the workload.

The permitting process for businesses and multifamily properties was another focal point. Residents voiced concerns about the necessity of hiring licensed contractors for repairs and the perceived inefficiencies in the current process. City officials clarified that businesses would follow the same procedures as residential properties, though additional complexities arose for condominium owners.

Katherine, a staff member, provided updates on compliance with FEMA regulations, particularly regarding flood vents and ground floor usage. She reassured residents that permits would be processed for those that were FEMA compliant, with updates communicated via email.

The meeting concluded with a discussion on debris collection, with new FEMA guidance allowing reimbursement for commercial debris on a one-pass basis. The commission emphasized the importance of clear communication and efficient debris management to support the community’s recovery.