Justin Keller from Advanced Engineering provided a comprehensive presentation on the topic, delineating the distinction between code and manual elements in the program and underscoring the significance of seawalls in preventing soil erosion and stabilizing shorelines. Keller’s presentation covered the proposed revisions to the code, including the requirement for seawalls to be designed by a Florida-registered professional engineer and the criteria for major repairs, which would necessitate new seawall construction in the event that more than 50% of a property’s shoreline length requires new panels.

The agency engaged in a discussion about the criteria for distinguishing major from minor repairs to seawalls, with major repairs triggering the need for a new seawall construction. The so-called “12-inch rule” was a focal point of debate. This rule permits existing seawalls to remain if the elevation change is less than 12 inches, which is considered inconsequential. The practicality and implications of this rule were scrutinized, alongside considerations for existing and future structures, the need for calculations ensuring seawalls can support additional height, and the importance of adhering to FEMA requirements for flood zones and slope limitations.

Participants also discussed the challenge of balancing regulatory requirements with practical considerations for property owners and builders. The conversation included the importance of obtaining accurate elevations along side lot lines to prevent adverse impacts on neighboring properties, and the need to address issues faced by smaller single-level homes when larger homes are elevated.

Further discussions centered on the potential impact of elevated seawalls on neighboring properties, particularly smaller single-level homes. There were concerns about properties becoming spillways to the street for wave action and the consequences of raising seawalls beyond certain limitations. The agency reiterated the importance of following FEMA guidelines and federal regulations, including wave run-up analysis, and ensuring that seawall elevation does not negatively affect neighboring properties during storm events.

In addition to the seawall elevation topic, the meeting covered a proposed manual that would affect building regulations in coastal and velocity zones. The manual would require new structures to comply, but existing compliant homes would not be affected unless they underwent substantial improvements. A proposed 10-year rule for these regulations was examined, as was the potential impact of property investments on the 50% rule.

The agency also deliberated on a resolution recommending the approval of an ordinance amendment for hotel requirements, particularly the removal of the 50-room requirement for certain services and alcohol beverage access. Additionally, a resolution regarding development regulations sought to provide clearer distinctions in certain definitions.

Lastly, the meeting’s logistics were addressed, with a debate about the timing of future meetings and the suggestion of changing the traditional 6 PM meeting time to an earlier slot in the afternoon. The potential absence of one member at the next meeting due to travel was also noted.