43:31The board’s discussion of the variance requests was notably detailed, emphasizing the difficulties faced by the applicants, Rick and Michelle Clark, due to the irregular shape of their lot. The Clarks sought to reduce the east setback from 7.5 feet to 3 feet 10 inches and the south setback from 10 feet to 6 feet 8 inches. They argued these reductions were necessary to accommodate an elevator for Rick, a medically retired veteran with a permanent disability. The elevator was deemed critical for accessibility, particularly as Rick’s mobility needs are expected to increase with age.

32:34Concerns from neighboring residents were also addressed. Jenny Gun, residing directly east of the Clarks’ property, voiced strong opposition, arguing that the proposed encroachment would obstruct her view and pose safety issues, particularly in terms of visibility when exiting her driveway. Allan Bills, another concerned resident, criticized the notion of self-created hardship, pointing out that all lots in the area have unique challenges, and he emphasized the importance of conducting due diligence before purchasing property.

37:13The Clarks’ representative defended the variance request by highlighting the relatively minor increase in square footage and refuting the idea of self-created hardship, especially given Rick’s disability. The representative underscored the Clarks’ commitment to maintaining good neighborly relations, proposing the addition of vegetation for privacy between properties.

01:15:45Despite the Clarks’ arguments and the board’s recognition of the unique circumstances surrounding the property, the board decided to deny both variance requests. A key factor in the decision was the potential safety risk posed by the proposed southern variance, where building closer to the road could exacerbate existing issues with emergency vehicle access.

01:31:50In addition to the variance discussion, the meeting covered broader topics related to the comprehensive planning and zoning framework in Treasure Island. The board acknowledged that the city’s comprehensive plan had not been thoroughly updated since 1998, despite an approval in 2023. Recent legislation required revisiting the plan, creating uncertainty about its legal status. The board was informed that phase one of the updated plan, addressing essential elements like floodplain and zoning regulations, was slated for review in the coming month.

01:39:43Discussions also touched upon the need for more effective public engagement in local development initiatives. Emphasizing the importance of community input, there was agreement on utilizing various communication channels to ensure residents are informed and involved in planning processes. This discussion highlighted the central business district as an area in need of revitalization, with calls for less restrictive zoning to attract investment and foster economic growth.

02:04:58Economic Development Director Joan Goodrich emphasized the potential for mixed-use development to revitalize the area, suggesting that local land could be more valuable if improved, thereby enhancing the non-residential tax base. Goodrich also detailed the challenges in securing federal funding for infrastructure projects, pointing out recent restrictions on FEMA public assistance dollars. She appealed for community participation in public comment periods to ensure that local needs are addressed in funding allocations.

01:51:04There was a consensus on the necessity of progress and a desire to create engaging spaces for residents while maintaining compliance with existing zoning laws.