Tree Cutting Violations Lead Townsend Conservation Commission Meeting

The Townsend Conservation Commission meeting on May 14 focused heavily on an enforcement issue regarding unauthorized tree cutting on Main Street properties, owned by Shephard Farm Incorporated, near the harbor and Rail Trail. The enforcement order addressed violations of the town’s wetland bylaw, which requires a vegetated buffer of at least 35 feet along wetlands and water bodies. The Commission emphasized the immediate cessation of activities within the 100-foot buffer zone and the 35-foot no-disturb zone, highlighting the significance of prompt compliance with local environmental regulations.

19:15The enforcement order stemmed from activities that contravened CMR 10.02, regulating actions in sensitive areas under MGL Chapter 131 Article 40. Although the commission lacked a quorum to take immediate further action, the enforcement letter was dispatched through certified mail and email, with confirmation of receipt acknowledged. This development underscores the Commission’s dedication to enforcing conservation laws and maintaining ecological buffers around wetland zones.

In the meeting, plans were made to visit the site to determine necessary remedial actions, with the machinery used for the tree cutting already removed. As discussions unfolded, there was a call for clarity in enforcement procedures. This issue is slated for further discussion at the next meeting, where a quorum is anticipated for a decisive vote on the violation’s resolution.

38:52Another topic of discussion was the encroachment issue on Dudley Meadows, a property under the jurisdiction of the conservation commission. The encroachment involved a neighboring property on Peter J. Drive, where a fence and shed were found on town land. Photographic evidence was reviewed, and the need for a cautious approach was emphasized, particularly avoiding confrontational methods like door-to-door inquiries. This cautious stance is expected to mitigate potential backlash from property owners and allow for a more diplomatic resolution.

24:43The meeting also explored the placement of boundary markers on newly surveyed properties on West Meadow Road and Leaf Meadows, with assistance from a local Boy Scouts troop. The troop’s involvement included setting up a camping trip to coincide with the boundary marking task. The boundary markers are to be placed at intervals of 75 feet or less, with markers at a height of approximately 5 ½ feet. This collaborative effort aims to ensure accurate property demarcations while providing a learning opportunity for the scouts.

In a show of support for community involvement, a motion to approve camping on the properties for the Boy Scouts was passed unanimously.

01:06:56The Commission also delved into the topic of climate resilience, discussing Townsend’s climate resilient drainage master plan project. Funded by the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs through the Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness (MVP) grant program, this initiative supports climate change planning and resilience-building efforts. The commission was encouraged to brainstorm potential projects, with the availability of grant money for studies and initiatives, including a culvert program. This discussion points to the Commission’s stance in addressing climate resilience and leveraging state resources for local environmental projects.

55:58Lastly, discussions regarding the designation of Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) highlighted the importance of state agency support in facilitating conservation efforts. The Commission noted that ACEC regulations enable grants and educational opportunities, emphasizing the potential for further environmental protection and resource acquisition. This aligns with the Commission’s broader goal of enhancing conservation efforts through informed and strategic planning.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: