0:28The proposed project, an 11-unit multifamily building by Watching Developers LLC, intended to be located in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Zone, was described by its proponents as a less intense use compared to other permissible developments like fast-food restaurants or medical offices. Despite these claims, the project raised concerns over its potential impact on the neighborhood.

2:13:45Flooding emerged as a primary concern, with numerous residents highlighting the area’s existing vulnerabilities. One resident elaborated on the flooding issues, stating that the area, particularly near the Raway River, often experiences overflow during heavy rains. The resident pointed out that the proposed development, positioned in flood zone X, would add to the water volume in the already strained storm sewer system. Another resident emphasized that flooding in the neighborhood happens “four or five times a year,” leaving some residents unable to exit their driveways. The apprehension was that the new construction could overload existing drainage systems, making the flooding situation even worse.

55:05The stormwater management plan presented by the developers was scrutinized extensively. The project’s engineer, Mark Ramos, explained that a sub-detention system was designed to manage runoff, directing water into the storm sewer. However, residents and some board members remained unconvinced that the system could handle extreme storm conditions. The lack of a comprehensive capacity analysis for the existing storm systems further fueled doubts about the project’s feasibility.

0:28Traffic concerns were another significant issue, with residents worried about increased congestion on already busy roads. A traffic engineer’s report estimated that the development would generate minimal traffic impact, with only a few trips during peak hours. However, residents and board members questioned the accuracy of these estimates. They expressed skepticism about the methodology used.

2:31:18Residents also raised concerns about the project’s compatibility with the existing neighborhood, characterized by single-family homes. They argued that the multifamily building would disrupt the community’s character, citing potential increases in noise, air pollution, and littering. One resident stated that the project would “dramatically change its quiet and peaceful nature,” while another emphasized the safety risks posed by increased traffic near school bus stops and medical offices.

2:50:57The Planning Board deliberated on these issues, with several members expressing reservations about the project’s alignment with the master plan’s goals. They highlighted the importance of maintaining the integrity of existing residential areas and preventing more intense uses that could lead to overcrowding. Concerns about the lack of convenient access to public transportation were also noted, as the development might increase dependency on personal vehicles, thus exacerbating traffic issues.

0:28Despite the developers’ assurances that the project met all zoning requirements and would have a lesser impact than other potential uses, the board ultimately decided against the application. The decision was made following a roll call vote, with members citing unresolved drainage concerns and the project’s potential negative impact on the neighborhood as key reasons for their opposition.