The primary focus of the meeting was the application by 809 Valley Street LLC to construct a 2,400-square-foot storage garage on a residential property. The property, described as flag-shaped and located in a flood hazard area, necessitated the variance since a garage is not a principal permitted use in the RA zone. The applicant’s attorney, Natasha Montalvo, clarified that the structure would serve solely for personal storage, accommodating items like lawn equipment and vehicles.

The garage’s construction raised significant concern from Thomas Gray, a resident who voiced skepticism about the feasibility of accommodating large vehicles like car carriers inside the proposed structure. Gray highlighted ongoing traffic disruptions caused by these carriers and expressed a desire for restrictions on the types of vehicles allowed to park in the area, stating that the presence of large trucks detracted from his enjoyment of his property.

Board attorney Rob Pansul acknowledged Gray’s concerns, emphasizing that the garage’s intent was to alleviate visual clutter by storing vehicles indoors. He assured that the structure would not be used for commercial purposes or the storage of hazardous materials. The board noted that temporary storage of large vehicles by a friend of the applicant had been confirmed.

Architect Joseé Janeiro provided further details about the garage, describing its construction with a concrete slab and block foundation, and its design to feature a center door and windows. The garage would be built with vinyl siding and fiberglass shingles, complemented by a thin stone veneer for aesthetic appeal. Janeiro assured the board that all fire safety regulations would be met, although questions about the necessity of sprinklers led to suggestions for further discussions with the fire department.

The board also heard from Katherine Gregory, a professional planner, who supported the variance by emphasizing the unique suitability of the site for the proposed garage. Gregory argued the garage would promote municipal land use goals, such as enhancing light, air, and open space, and would not detract from the public good or the zoning ordinance’s intent.

Despite some reservations, the board collectively agreed that the garage would improve site organization and aesthetics while meeting all necessary criteria. Board member Mr. Johnson underscored the importance of adhering to fire safety stipulations, while Ms. Martins and Mr. Bentegna expressed optimism about the garage’s potential to enhance the property.

Ultimately, the board approved the variance, mandating compliance with all professional review comments and safety requirements. The decision was met with an acknowledgment of the importance of ongoing communication between residents and the building department to address any future concerns.