The matter of signage in Vernon emerged as a issue during the council meeting. Council members expressed surprise at the number of businesses utilizing feather flags and other types of advertisements. The conversation revealed a split in opinion, with some council members advocating for stricter enforcement of the current ordinance to control the proliferation of signs, while others pushed for a revision that would accommodate businesses and provide clear enforcement guidelines, especially in residential areas. The council agreed to seek input from the economic development committee, business owners, and zoning officials before making any ordinance revisions. The goal was to find a balance between maintaining the town’s aesthetic and supporting local businesses through fair and consistent regulations.

The discussion then shifted to the topic of mayoral compensation, a subject that garnered considerable attention. The council examined mayoral salaries in neighboring municipalities, noting disparities and considering the implications of Vernon’s government structure on compensation. The mayor’s responsibilities were scrutinized, with the mayor estimating a 50-60 hour workweek involvement in various town committees and volunteer activities. This led to a broader debate about whether the mayor’s position should be full-time, with a higher salary to attract better-qualified candidates or remain part-time. The impact of the decision on the quality of future mayoral candidates was a concern, with some council members wary of potential candidates motivated by financial gain. Discussion included the possibility of placing the question of the mayor’s status and salary on the ballot for community decision.

Another notable topic was the mayor’s role and the town’s leadership structure. The idea of adopting a strong mayor model was supported by at least one council member and the potential to reduce the CFO position to part-time to allocate more funds for the mayor’s salary was discussed. The council also contemplated the recent decision in West Milford to make the mayor a full-time employee, complete with pension and benefits, which raised skepticism about practicality and the precedent it might set.

In addition to these primary issues, the council tackled various ordinances and resolutions. Ordinance 2411, concerning limousine licensing, was debated with a public member questioning the need for additional township requirements when state processes already exist. Despite skepticism, the council passed the ordinance, citing the need for added measures of protection for the township.

Ordinance 2412, dealing with exterior lighting standards, was also a contentious subject. A member of the public labeled the ordinance as possibly overreaching. The council clarified the ordinance’s intent to prevent public nuisances caused by intrusive lighting rather than to impose broad restrictions. After thorough discussion, the ordinance was approved.

The council proceeded to address several resolutions, including grant applications for road improvements and the authorization of a payroll processing vendor. Concerns were raised about the payroll company’s access to the town’s bank accounts for tax payments, stemming from previous issues with such arrangements. Nonetheless, the resolution was approved, with a single dissenting vote.

The meeting concluded with a discussion on the need for a segregation of duties in handling incoming funds, particularly tax payments, and a motion to introduce an ordinance regarding taxi cabs and auto cabs. Public comments were heard on various topics, including the sign ordinance, solicitor licenses, lighting regulations, and the mayor’s salary. The council president announced the cancellation of the July and August meetings due to vacation schedules. The meeting was adjourned following a motion that was unanimously approved.