The most notable issue was the proposed 2.5% tax increase, which sparked discussion among the council members. One member voiced their reluctance to raise taxes, stating, “I didn’t run for this position to give myself the ability to raise taxes more than my predecessor.” Another member highlighted the influence of inflation, indicating an expected inflation rate of 3.5 to 4% for the year, which would affect the township’s expenses. Despite the divided opinions, the council proceeded with a vote that resulted in a split decision on the tax increase.

In addition to the tax debate, the council tackled the topic of cannabis establishment licensing. A notable move was made to shift the responsibility of performing background checks from the Vernon Township Police to the New Jersey State Police. This ordinance change, which was adopted after a public hearing, aimed to relieve the local police of this duty. Concerns were raised about the clarity of the ordinance’s language, with suggestions that resolutions should articulate complete thoughts more clearly.

The meeting also addressed the redevelopment of a property within the township, which involved the approval of a long-term tax exemption and the authorization of a financial agreement for urban renewal. The council moved forward with these initiatives.

Another topic of interest was a business seeking approval for a cannabis establishment, which led to a debate over whether the business should adhere to new licensing fees or the old ones due to a change of address. The town attorney opined that the new licenses should apply, prompting a discussion about the permitted number of retail establishments. The council decided to table the resolution to gather more information.

The council’s discussions extended to the township’s budget, particularly the need for emergency temporary appropriations. Questions arose about the necessity of a temporary budget, given the existing 12-month budget from the previous year. The finance director provided insight into why certain line items might require more funding at the start of the year, highlighting the need for a clearer understanding of how the temporary appropriations would support the town’s budget until the full budget’s approval.

Further financial deliberations included a resolution on reimbursing the fire department and emergency medical services monthly. The council debated alignment of the town’s fiscal year with either the calendar year or the state fiscal year, considering statutory deadlines for budget submission, introduction, and adoption set by the state.

In a related matter, the council discussed the introduction of an ordinance to exceed municipal budget appropriation limits and establish a cap bank. This led to an in-depth explanation of the budget’s components—appropriations, revenues, and surplus—and how the cap bank influences them. Council members sought clarification on the implications for taxes and the use of fund balances for expenditures. The role of revenues and surpluses in managing the town’s finances was also a focal point, with debates on the necessity of the cap bank and its effect on taxpayers.

The council’s recognition of Sergeant Ronald Karis for his involvement in a case with 91 dogs marked a moment of commendation. The case required coordination with various organizations.

During public comments, a resident addressed concerns about the 3.5% cap bank ordinance, urging a more transparent explanation of municipal government matters and better communication. This highlighted the community’s desire for clarity in the council’s decision-making processes.

Administrative discussions included the need to improve the township’s telephone system and the planning of an upcoming budget seminar. The council debated the allocation of funds for the seminar and its potential to inform budget strategy.