The meeting’s spotlight was on the persistent cellular connectivity issues in key areas like Maple Grange Park and Routes 517 and 515. A council member highlighted the lack of a usable dial tone in these areas, stressing the importance of reliable communication, particularly for families with children. The council discussed a long-anticipated cell tower project, with updates revealing that zoning drawings were being prepared and permits expected to be filed by April. Construction might begin in the fall if zoning proceeds without delays. In the interim, the council considered implementing Wi-Fi service in the park as a temporary measure. Additionally, the council addressed a related issue involving power outages at Legends, noting that an emergency services antenna had been disconnected without impacting communication. This was viewed as a positive outcome amidst ongoing construction concerns.

A significant portion of the meeting was devoted to the contentious topic of the mayor’s salary. Currently set at $30,000 per year, the council discussed the possibility of establishing a salary range for the mayor akin to other town employees. Concerns were raised about the practicality and potential community backlash of placing any salary increase on the November ballot. One council member questioned if higher compensation would indeed attract more qualified candidates, emphasizing the need for a resolution to avoid repetitive debates. Financial implications of placing the salary increase on the ballot were also discussed, with estimates suggesting such a measure could cost around $50,000. The council acknowledged the importance of public input and the potential for a public petition to challenge any salary ordinance.

Public comments further fueled the debate on the mayor’s compensation. Residents expressed varying opinions on whether the current salary was adequate given the mayor’s responsibilities. Some argued that the workload deserved better compensation, while others felt the existing governance structure, including the role of the business administrator, already covered the town’s needs. The discussion revealed a divide among council members and residents, with concerns about administrative costs and the need for effective governance amidst growing town responsibilities.

Emergency appropriations and trust fund management were also on the agenda. A council member inquired about the encumbered checks for December, particularly regarding snow removal contracts. It was explained that snow removal expenses were charged to a snow trust fund, which is dedicated to specific uses like recreational programs. The council also addressed state mandates concerning tax cancellations for disabled veterans, noting the financial burden placed on local taxpayers due to these unfunded mandates. A council member expressed gratitude to veterans while highlighting frustrations with the state’s lack of financial support.

The council handled various resolutions, including tax cancellations for disabled veterans and the approval of an HVAC maintenance service bid. A municipal prosecutor was appointed following interviews involving the police chief and court administrator. The introduction of the 2025 municipal budget passed despite some members not fully reviewing the document. A discussion on an ordinance concerning non-conforming buildings and property regulations ensued, with concerns raised about safety and the potential for homes to be too close to roadways. The council emphasized the need for oversight from the land use board to prevent past mistakes in building safety.

Public comments covered a range of issues, from local traffic regulations to the town’s sound system, which residents claimed hindered communication during meetings. There was also discussion on the potential for changing the town’s governance structure under the Faulkner Act, with some residents suggesting a need for more proactive governance to manage the town’s growth.