At the heart of the meeting was an extensive discussion on the hockey program’s viability. The program’s expense and relatively low participation rates have brought its future into question. Board members deliberated on the implications of potentially discontinuing the program, considering the effects on student opportunities and the district’s budget. The historical significance of the Verona-Glen Ridge program, one of the oldest joint ventures in New Jersey, was also taken into account. Members discussed the importance of evaluating the program’s contributions to student success and character development, pondering the need for more data to make an informed decision.

Another topic was the strategic plan update, which spotlighted four main goal areas: student outcomes, college and career readiness, social and emotional learning, and community-school relations. The update included accomplishments such as the implementation of a gifted and talented program, increased dual enrollment opportunities, and the transition to Care Plus. The initiative’s progress was measured through specific assessments for individual schools in English language arts and math. Furthermore, the redesign of the district website and the allocation of resources for the Parent Academy were addressed.

The board also touched on the importance of improving the Capstone program. Enhancements focus on increasing accountability and ensuring that students’ experiences align with their career interests. Discussions included the potential for reaching out to local businesses to expand career opportunities for students. Additionally, the board examined the training of teachers in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) by an outside agency, with a view towards eventually moving this training in-house. Concerns were raised about the selection process for trainers and the support provided by building administrators for both students and teachers.

Survey practices within the district were scrutinized, with a proposition to form a committee to develop a district-specific survey, rather than relying on a paid model. The Rucker’s climate report was cited, with board members questioning its generic nature and relevance to the district’s unique needs. The lack of room for comments in the parent survey and a desire for clearer staff responses were also points of contention.

The financial aspect of the district’s operations was a critical part of the discussion, with the tentative 2024-2025 budget requiring the use of additional funds from the fund balance. These funds are earmarked for the expansion of programs and technology and the hiring of a new special education teacher. A new bill that proposes a uniform tuition amount for non-resident students was also debated, leading to a decision to table related agenda items pending further analysis.

Other items included a debate on the registration process for kindergarten to ensure that all registered students could be accommodated. The board also discussed the Community Garden’s request for funding to build a fence and recommended exploring alternative funding options.

The meeting concluded with routine matters, such as tabling certain resolutions and setting the date for the next board meeting. In a moment of recognition, congratulations were extended to an individual for achieving the status of Master Board Member.